All this and the nuclear age to boot, because a single premise was changed.
If you been following this forum, you are likely aware that its participants no longer accept the prophetic significance of 1914. (See Was 1914 the Start of Christ’s Presence? for details.) Since 1914 is so fundamental to many of our prophetic interpretations, it follows that changing this single premise potentially changes everything. In a word, 1914 is the linchpin. Like a real linchpin, our belief in 1914 as the start of Christ’s presence holds in place the interpretive structure of our understanding of all the last days prophecies. Pull up that pin and the wheels come off.
Perhaps it is time to pull that pin.
In subsequent posts, we will go through the Revelation Climax book with a view to examining every prophetic interpretation that we have linked to 1914. As you read these posts, if you feel that we are off-base in any way, please feel free to comment. The purpose of this forum is not to undermine anyone's faith, but rather to arrive at a deeper and more accurate understanding of Scripture. We welcome your input.
Archived Comments
We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.
Comment by apollos0falexandria on 2012-08-28 13:02:45
That will be quite a challenge to dissect the 1914 references. All of the 1918 and 1919 applications hinge on that pivotal date also.
At a quick count it appears that there are the following number of entries for each in the Revelation Book:
1914:- 102
1918:- 55
1919:- 78
Interestingly when reading the book as a whole it seems that the things that are expected for the future pertaining to Babylon the Great, the UN and world governments still seem to make a lot of sense. It is the bulk of the material that tries to make much of the content of Revelation fit the 20th century history of JW's that flounders. No doubt this is all related to beginning with a false premise as you describe in your article.