I think for most of us the answer would be a resounding Yes!
Well, then, it follows that we all want to be in this new covenant. We want Jehovah to write his law in our heart. Unfortunately, we are taught that only a tiny minority, currently less than 0.02% of all Christians, are in this “new covenant”. What is our scriptural reason for teaching such a thing?
We believe that only 144,000 go to heaven. We believe this is a literal number. Since we also believe that only those who go to heaven are in the new covenant, we are forced to conclude that millions of Jehovah’s Witnesses today are not in a covenant relationship with God. Therefore, Jesus is not our mediator and we are not God’s sons. (w89 8/15 Questions from Readers)
Now the Bible doesn’t actually say any of this, but through a line of deductive reasoning, based on a number of assumptions, this is the point at which we have arrived. Alas, it forces us to some rather bizarre and contradictory conclusions. To give but one example, Galatians 3:26 says that “YOU are all, in fact, sons of God through YOUR faith in Christ Jesus.” There are almost eight million of us now who have faith in Christ Jesus, but we are being told that we are not sons of God, just good friends. (w12 7/15 p. 28, par 7)
Let us see ‘if these things are really so.’ (Acts 17:11)
Since Jesus referred to this covenant as ‘new’, there must have been a former covenant. In fact, the covenant that the New Covenant replaces was a contractual agreement which Jehovah made with the nation of Israel at Mount Sinai. Moses first gave them the terms. They listened and agreed to the terms. At that point they were in a contractual agreement with God Almighty. Their side of the agreement was to obey all of God’s commandments. God’s side was to bless them, make them into his special property, and to turn them into a holy nation and a “kingdom of priests”. This is known as the Law Covenant and it was sealed, not with signatures on a piece of paper, but with blood.
(Exodus 19:5, 6) . . .And now if YOU will strictly obey my voice and will indeed keep my covenant, then YOU will certainly become my special property out of all [other] peoples, because the whole earth belongs to me. 6 And YOU yourselves will become to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’. . .
(Hebrews 9:19-21) . . .For when every commandment according to the Law had been spoken by Moses to all the people, he took the blood of the young bulls and of the goats with water and scarlet wool and hyssop and sprinkled the book itself and all the people, 20 saying: “This is the blood of the covenant that God has laid as a charge upon YOU.”
In making this covenant, Jehovah was keeping an even older covenant which he had made with Abraham.
(Genesis 12:1-3) 12 And Jehovah proceeded to say to A?bram: “Go your way out of your country and from your relatives and from the house of your father to the country that I shall show you; 2 and I shall make a great nation out of you and I shall bless you and I will make your name great; and prove yourself a blessing. 3 And I will bless those who bless you, and him that calls down evil upon you I shall curse, and all the families of the ground will certainly bless themselves by means of you.”
A great nation was to come from Abraham, but more, the nations of the world would be blessed by this nation.
Now the Israelites failed to keep their end of the agreement. So Jehovah wasn’t legally bound to them anymore, but he still had the covenant with Abraham to keep. So about the time of the Babylonian exile he inspired Jeremiah to write about a new covenant, one that would take effect when the old one ceased. The Israelites had already invalidated it by their disobedience, but Jehovah exercised his right to keep it in force for many centuries until the time of the Messiah. In fact, it stayed in force until 3 ½ years after the death of Christ. (Dan. 9:27)
Now the New Covenant was also sealed with blood, just as the former one was. (Luke 22:20) Under the New Covenant, membership was not restricted to the nation of natural Jews. Anyone from any nation could become a member. Membership was not a right of birth, but was voluntary, and depended on putting faith in Jesus Christ. (Gal. 3:26-29)
So having examined these scriptures, it is now clear that all natural Israelites from the time of Moses at Mt. Sinai down to the days of Christ were in a covenant relationship with God. Jehovah doesn’t make empty promises. Therefore, if they had remained faithful, he would have kept his word and made them into a kingdom of priests. The question is: Would every last one of them become a heavenly priest?
Let’s assume the number of 144,000 is literal. (Granted, we could be wrong about this, but play along because, literal or symbolic, it really doesn’t matter for purposes of this argument.) We should also assume that Jehovah purposed this whole arrangement way back in the garden of Eden when he gave the prophesy of the seed. This would have included determining the final number who would be needed to fill the office of heavenly kings and priests so as to achieve the healing and reconciliation of mankind.
If the number is literal, then only a subset of natural Israelites would have been appointed to heavenly places of oversight. Yet, it is clear that all the Israelites were in the old covenant. Likewise, if the number is not literal, there are two possibilities for who would become kings and priests: 1) It is an undeclared yet predetermined number that would have constituted a subset of all natural Jews, or 2) it is an indeterminate number comprising every faithful Jew who ever lived.
Let’s be clear. We are not here trying to determine how many Jews would have gone to heaven if they hadn’t broken the covenant, nor are we trying to determine how many Christians will go. What we are asking is how many Christians are in the new covenant? Given that in each of the three scenarios we’ve looked at, all natural Jews—all fleshly Israel—were in the former covenant, there is every reason to conclude that all members of spiritual Israel are in the New Covenant. (Gal. 6:16) Every member of the Christian congregation is in the New Covenant.
If the number of kings and priests is a literal 144,000, then Jehovah will select them out of the entire 2,000-year-old Christian congregation in the New Covenant, just as he would have done from the 1,600-year-old house of Israel under the Law Covenant. If the number is symbolic, but still represents an indeterminate—to us—number from within the new covenant, then this understanding still works. After all, is that not what Revelation 7:4 says? Are these not sealed out of every tribe of the sons of Israel. Every tribe was present when Moses mediated the first covenant. If they had remained faithful then the (symbolic/literal) number of those sealed would have come out of those tribes. The Israel of God replaced the natural nation, but nothing else changed about this arrangement; only the source from which the kings and priests are extracted.
Now is there a scripture or series of scriptures that proves the opposite? Can we show from the Bible that the vast majority of Christians are not in a covenant relationship with Jehovah? Can we show that Jesus and Paul were only speaking about a tiny fraction of Christians being in the New Covenant when they spoke of the fulfillment of Jeremiah’s words?
Failing some pretty sound reasoning to the contrary, we are forced to acknowledge that like the Israelites of old, all Christians are in a covenant relationship with Jehovah God. Now we can choose to be like the vast majority of ancient Israelites and fail to live up to our side of the covenant, and so, lose out on the promise; or, we can choose to obey God and live. Either way, we are in the New Covenant; we have Jesus as our mediator; and if we put faith in him, we are God’s children.
Archived Comments
We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.
Comment by on 2013-05-20 09:11:04
This is one of the main reasons why I stepped down as elder. The bible is quite clear that there are more than just a few thousand in the New Covenant. I could no longer support and teach the opposite of what I felt the bible clearly taught.
It's pretty amazing that the Society has convinced millions of Christians that they aren't in the New Covenant and are not sons and daughters of God. Instead they are like a spiritual orphan without a covenant. Since the New Covenant sealed with Jesus' blood is the basis for forgiving sins, on what basis are sins forgiven outside the New Covenant?
The Old Covenant had a plethora a laws that those in the Old Covenant had to abide by. If the "great crowd" of "other sheep" isn't in the New Covenant how are they under obligation to keep the laws and principles of the New Covenant? A covenant is an agreement between 2 parties. If we aren't in that agreement then God hasn't promised us anything and we aren't under the obligation to obey anything.
If we aren't in the New Covenant on what basis are we God's people? How is God's law on our hearts? How is Jehovah our God? How can we say that God is our Father?Reply by hezekiah1 on 2013-05-21 12:33:26
Thanks Anonymous, I really understand what you are saying. And your points here are well taken.
Even now as i serve i am careful on what i comment in the WT or in other meeting parts. I have mentioned this to some of my fellow elders at times and have received incredible resistance. I have ceased making my thoughts public. As you have said it is pretty incredible that the WTS has convinced so many of this belief. I was of the same opinion until recently. How I didn't see it until now even though the scriptures were plainly there is beyond me.
Whats more troubling to me though is that i have noticed a trend to put more weight to the writings of the WT than in the Bible itself. In fact i remember showing a brother a scripture in Luke disproving our official thinking on a matter but he responded Never doubt the Slave Class.
We have steadily been conditioned to believe humans even over God. I cant see how this course will lead us to anyplace good.
Comment by Chris on 2013-05-20 09:43:30
I enjoyed the clean lines of argument on this subject.
I would say that this is game, set & match against the WTS false teaching.
I have been troubled for many years over some of our teachings that just do not hold water. However from your understanding of scripture do you say that we are God's organisation despite these falsehoods and if so when did we become such in modern times?Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2013-05-20 10:03:17
I have been giving much thought to that question lately. It is a complicated one because so much emotion gets in the way. I'm preparing a post on the subject and hope to have it clearly thought through within a couple more weeks.
Comment by crazyguy on 2013-05-20 12:02:40
I have come to the same conclusion about all Christian's being sons of God, anointed by holy-spirit and under the new covenant but i am still wondering exactly who are the great crowd and the 144k? Is the 144k all true Christian's and the great crowd all non Christian's that maybe have a change of heart during the great tribulation? Or are the great crowd all Christian's and the 144k are just the first fruits? I have even read a theory that the 144k represent the Jews in the new covenant and the great crowd are the Gentiles.
It would be a wonderful discussion to try and get a clearer understanding of the subject.Reply by miken on 2013-05-25 11:03:21
"I have even read a theory that the 144k represent the Jews in the new covenant and the great crowd are the Gentiles".
144,000 Christianized Jews?
I agree that at this time we cannot be sure whether or not the number is literal or symbolic. However I find the Watchtower position unconvincing in that at Rev 7:4-8 the 144,000 is taken as literal yet within the same context the 12,000's from the 12 Tribes symbolic.There is nothing in the scriptures themselves to identify the 144,000 as Kings and Priests. The 144,000 are stated to be sealed out of every tribe of the sons of Israel. If the 144,000 is a literal number it might possibly be that the number is made up only of Christianized Jews. What is the scriptural evidence that this could be the case?
There are a significant number of scriptures showing that during Jesus ministry and after his death many Jews put their faith in him and became Christians. From John's gospel we have examples at 2:13; 7:31; 8:30; 10:42; 11:45; 11:48; 12:11; 12:42. In the book of Acts we have accounts at 2:41; 2:47; 4:4 (just the men only recorded); 5:14; 8:12; 9:31,35,42; 14:1; 17:4,10,12; 21:20; 28:17,24. Other scriptures also show the extent of the preaching and teaching to the Jews at Acts 5:28,42; 8:25; Paul often initially witnessed to the Jews going to the synagogue when he arrived in a city, Acts 17:2; 18:4,5;. There was also the ministries of Peter, James and John to the Jews Gal 2:8,9; and possibly to the East of Jerusalem 1Pet5:13.
Another indication of the extent to which Jews were turning to Christianity is indicated by the two Greek words used to denote a thousand or many thousands. At Acts 2:41, 4:4, Rev 7:4-8; 14:1 the Greek word used is chilias from chilioi literally one thousand. However at Acts 21:20 the Greek word for "thousands" is murias which can have the meanings of thousands of 10 thousand, an indefinite number or myriads.
Even today there are estimated to be about 20 thousand Christianized Jews so I believe with the scriptural evidence I have referred to it is quite possible that the 144,000 are only made up of Jews who have put their faith in Jesus Christ, John 14:6, and partake of his flesh and blood, John 6:48-58.
In the NWT Rev 14:4 referring to the 144,000 it states “These were brought from among mankind as firstfruits (cross ref q ) to God and to the Lamb”. One of the three “q” cross refs is to James 1:18, the NIV as well as James 1:18 also has another significant cross ref to Jeremiah 2:3
The “us to be certain firstfruits of his creatures” in verse 18 of James 1 must mean the Jews for in verse 1 of chapter 1 James addresses his letter to “the twelve tribes that are scattered about”. The twelve tribes “c” cross ref to Acts 26:7 again clearly refers to the Jews. Therefore the 144,000 firstfruits of Rev 14:4 appear to be made up of Jews, which supports the record at Rev 7:4-8 that the 144,000 is made up of 12,000 “out of every tribe of the sons of Israel” mentioned in verse 4.
James letter to “the twelve tribes that are scattered about” was part of his agreed ministry to “those who were circumcised” see Gal 2:9Reply by wild olive on 2020-03-23 08:46:47
I personally feel this is a good explanation of the 144000.
They are chosen from the tribes of Israel , so it seems that they are Jews who have accepted Christ,but, John says at the beginning of his revelation that it’s in signs, so how can I put a literal interpretation on something that’s figurative?
Comment by Meleti Vivlon on 2013-05-20 12:53:48
It does make for an interesting topic, though I doubt that any solid conclusion could be reached. I think it will be one of those prophecies understood only in the fulfillment. In other words, fun to speculate about, but let's not turn it into doctrine. That is what has led us to so many problems as a religion, teaching human speculation as doctrine of God.
Reply by Jude on 2013-05-20 14:38:38
I agree. I think it is pride that causes religious leaders to think that they have to have an answer for the meaning of every scripture. And it is pride that leads them to insist that their interpretation is the correct one.
It is sufficient that we familiarize ourselves with the message of Revelation and look at possible ways it can be fulfilled while keeping an open mind. When knowledge of its meaning becomes a critical matter, God will give understanding to his humble, open-minded servants.
But if a servant is proudly insisting in his heart that he has the correct understanding, how will he be able to discern a fulfillment different to the one he is expecting? What if he has to act quickly upon receiving the correct understanding? Couldn't pride blind him from seeing the true fulfilment or cause him to delay in accepting it and acting on it in a timely manner?
Would Jehovah even give the correct understanding to haughty ones who insist that their understanding is the correct one? Dogmatism is with pride, humility is with open-mindedness.
Comment by Chris on 2013-05-21 20:32:59
" it is sufficient that we familiarize ourselves with the message of Revelation and look at possible ways it can be fulfilled while keeping an open mind. When knowledge of its meaning becomes a critical matter, God will give understanding to his humble, open-minded servants "
That is very good point and argues that the WTS (and others) are actually guilty of the very thing they accuse 'apostates' of, namely presumptuousness and pushing ahead.
Somewhat ironic I think
Comment by Who Should Partake? | Beroean Pickets on 2013-05-22 16:05:46
[…] The scriptural evidence favors the view that all Christians are in the New Covenant just as all natural Jews were in the old one. (See post: Are You in the New Covenant) […]
Comment by Remember Those Who Instructed You | Beroean Pickets on 2013-10-13 11:01:05
[…] See Are You in the New Covenant; The Spirit Bears Witness; Who Should Partake; and Kiss the […]
Comment by Francisco on 2019-01-03 23:21:37
You're absolutely right, Eric. That is such a simple logic that you wonder why the "fateful slave" couldn't figure it out. I hope that this is one more doctrinal error and not an intentional blunder with the purpose of creating a superior class that could more easily control and dominate God's household. The latter would actually be very evil.