[From ws1/17 p. 18 April 17-23]
“Jehovah will always lead you.” – Isaiah 58:11
Right from the get-go, there is a major problem with this article: Its premise. The title will immediately invoke the idea in the mind of the reader that Jehovah is leading the organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Yet the Bible makes it very clear that we have one leader, Jesus Christ.
“Neither be called leaders, for your Leader is one, the Christ.” (Mt 23:10)
A witness might counter that Jesus obeys Jehovah so that in a sense it is Jehovah who is leading his people. This is essentially the point made in the opening two paragraphs. This is shallow reasoning that stems from the organization's need to emphasize Jehovah over Jesus as a means for Jehovah's Witnesses to distinguish themselves from the rest of Christendom. What is worse is that it disregards what the Bible explicitly says on the subject of who leads us. Indeed, if this reasoning were valid, why would Jesus have referred to himself as the one and only leader of his disciples? Why would he claim that all authority had been granted him if in fact Jehovah still retained a leadership role?
“Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying: “All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth. 19 Go, therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit,” (Mt 28:18, 19)
These words indicate that Jehovah trusted Jesus to such an extent that he gave him full authority and made him the leader. Further, God told us specifically, in his own voice no less, to listen to his Son.
“. . .And a cloud formed, overshadowing them, and a voice came out of the cloud: 'This is my Son, the beloved; listen to him.'” (Mr 9:7)
Nowhere in the Christian Scriptures are we told that our leader is Jehovah God. What we are told explicitly can be found – to give one example – in the book of Ephesians:
“. . .with which he has operated in the case of the Christ when he raised him up from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places, 21 far above every government and authority and power and lordship and every name named, not only in this system of things, but also in that to come. 22 He also subjected all things under his feet, and made him head over all things to the congregation,” (Eph 1:20-22)
From these verses, it is very clear that Jehovah God is transferring authority from himself to his Son. True, when Isaiah wrote the words in our theme text, Jehovah was the leader of his people, the nation of Israel. However when he established the Christian congregation, all that changed. Jesus is now our leader. We have no need for others. When Jehovah established Moses as the head of Israel, certain men became envious of his role. Men like Korah. They wanted to be the go-between, the channel between God and the nation. We now have the greater Moses in Jesus Christ. We have no need for a replacement, a modern-day Korah.
That being said, let us look at the content of this week’s Watchtower article.
Introduction
Paragraphs 1 and 2 lay the groundwork for the article by attempting to compare us with other religions. These may ask, “Who is your leader?” They are implying a human leader. We reply that our leader is Jesus Christ who follows the lead of Jehovah God. Again, we make Jesus the go-between instead of the commander-in-chief. The opening paragraph implies that we are different from other religions in this. Of course, we are not. Whether Catholic, Protestant, Baptist, or Mormon, each in turn would claim Jesus as their leader while explaining that certain men take the lead in their church under Jesus’ leadership. How is this any different from what we are attempting to say in this article? We do not have a Pope, nor Archbishop, nor an apostolic succession, but we do have a Governing Body. To misquote Shakespeare, “A rose by any other name, still has thorns”.
The article will now attempt to lay the groundwork for drawing a parallel between ancient Bible examples of men used by God to take the lead and the modern-day Governing Body. This line of reasoning will conclude with next week's article.
Empowered by Holy Spirit
The evidence that Moses was empowered by Holy Spirit is overwhelming. Under Joshua, Holy Spirit brought the walls of Jericho down. Gideon overwhelmed a vastly superior military force with only 300 men. And then we have David. He did many great things when the Holy Spirit was with him. However, when he sinned as he did with Bathsheba, things did not go so well. The presence of the Holy Spirit is not guaranteed. Its flow can be hindered, even stopped, by sin.
For example, in the Bible record there is no complaint made against Joshua. He seems to have maintained his integrity throughout his life. Nevertheless, under his leadership Israel experienced a shocking defeat. This was due to the sin of one man, Achan. Only when that sin was discovered and punishment for Achan’s disobedience had been meted out, did the Holy Spirit return to ensure victory. (Joshua 7:10-26)
From these accounts it is very clear that Jehovah does not channel his spirit through any man or group of men if these individuals are engaged in disobedience and sin.
In next week’s Watchtower study, the Governing Body is going to attempt to use what is taught this week as a means to demonstrate that in this modern world, they are the chosen ones of God to lead his people. When you come to next week’s study, remember the lessons from David’s life as well as the incident with Achan. Then think about this: in 1991, while condemning the Catholic Church for having 24 nongovernmental organization members in the United Nations, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses applied for membership in that same organization on behalf of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. They achieved membership in 1992 and continued renewing it annually for a 10-year period, only stopping when they were exposed in a newspaper article. Moreover, they never acknowledged any wrongdoing or expressed any repentance for what they themselves qualify as a sin. According to the elders manual, Shepherd the Flock of God, the mere act of joining, or becoming a member of, a non-neutral organization such as the United Nations immediately results in one’s disassociation (disfellowshipping by another name). (See ks p. 112) Yet the men of the Governing Body never considered themselves, nor were considered by others, to be disfellowshipped for this action. As self-proclaimed anointed ones making up the faithful and discreet slave, they are part of the bride of Christ, and as such maintain a virginal status of chastity toward their betrothed, our Lord Jesus. Such ones do not worship the wild beast nor its image. (Re 20:4; 14:4) Yet that is exactly what these men did. This, by their own definition, constitutes gross spiritual adultery of the worst kind!
From what we have studied of past examples of men who were guided by holy spirit, can there be any doubt that the Holy Spirit would have been withheld in such a circumstance? Indeed, since no acknowledgment of sin, nor repentance thereof, has ever been expressed, is there any reason to assume that the Holy Spirit returned once they broke off their immoral relationship with the image of the wild beast? If not, then can we honestly say that Jehovah God has been guiding the organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses for the past 25 years? Can we truly believe that the righteous God with whom there is no injustice has overlooked this incredible betrayal of his Son. The Governing body, as the self-proclaimed faithful slave who gets appointed over all Jesus's belongings, would constitute the most prominent part of the bride class. Would Jehovah really turn a blind eye to their fornication and continue to bless them with his Holy Spirit?
Guided by God’s Word
Paragraphs 10 through 14 demonstrate how the men that Jehovah used to guide his people were men who adhered rigidly to his inspired word. When the kings of Israel deviated from God’s word, things went bad for the people.
Undoubtedly, Witnesses will consider that the Governing Body is likewise guided by God’s word. A perusal of the various articles on the Beroean Pickets Archive Site will demonstrate that this is not the case. Whether it be the 1914 return of Christ, or the 1919 appointment of the faithful slave, or the two-hope doctrine of salvation, or the prohibition against the medical use of blood, or the JW judicial system, one will see that none of these originates with God, but with men.
Jehovah Appoints a Perfect Leader
The closing paragraphs of this study offer evidence that Jesus Christ was the perfect leader that Jehovah chose to lead his congregation. However, the goal of this study and the one that follows is not to engender confidence in Jesus as a leader. Rather, the purpose is to bolster belief in the leadership of men, specifically, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses. With this in mind, the final paragraph leaves the reader with the following questions to ponder prior to next week’s study:
But as an invisible spirit in heaven, how would Jesus lead God’s people on earth? Whom would Jehovah use to work under Christ’s leadership and take the lead among His people? And how would Christians be able to recognize his representatives? The next article will consider the answers to those questions. – par. 21
It would seem that, being far away in heaven, Jesus cannot effectively lead his people on earth. Instead, he needs visible representatives. That is the first premise they wish us to accept. Next, notice that it is not Christ who chooses these individuals, but rather Jehovah does: “Whom would Jehovah use...?” Again, we are taking the focus away from our appointed leader. If we accept these two premises, the next question is how would we recognize God’s representatives. How would we know whom Jehovah has chosen to lead us? We will see how the Governing Body attempts to answer these questions in next week's study.
Archived Comments
We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.
Comment by John S on 2017-04-16 20:11:05
Exactly, Meleti, amen.
Col. 1:15
"Now Christ is the visible expression of the invisible God. He existed before creation began, for it was through him that everything was made, whether spiritual or material, seen or unseen.
Through him and for him, also were created power and dominion, ownership and authority. In fact, every single thing was created through him and for him.....
It was in him that the full nature of God chose to live, and through him God planned to reconcile in his own person, as it were, everything on earth and everything in heaven by virtue of the sacrifice of the cross."
"I myself (Paul) have been a minister of the same gospel....and the secret is simply this; Christ in you! Yes, Christ in you bringing with him the hope of all the glorious things to come." (Please note Col. ch 1 in it's entirety) Accepting Christ's spirit into our mortal bodies is repeated throughout the NT. (Rom.8)
The amplification of the theme you have chosen for the essay above is what the entire NT is; The Son of God is the High Priest for the reconciliation back to Jehovah God. He is also the sacrifice!
But, he is utmost 'God' also, by reason of his creation as the Son of God, an exact representation of his Father, as Colossians explains, and WHY the universe was created...FOR and BY Christ . It is his father's GIFT to him.
The Apostles, and the women and men who followed Jesus had the right perspective; they worshiped him, and we should also.
How? By shedding the teachings of WT, refusing to listen to garbage
Michael the archangel is Jesus (demoted to angel status; not a god)
GB is our teacher, not Christ or the Holy Spirit
Only a teeny little remnant of 144,000-replacements are spirit born world-wide
(although Jesus clearly teaches the harvest of spirit anointed brothers occurs at the end of the system when he returns. (That means more than ever...millions literally)
I meet these good, kind Christian souls every week in varying churches, and explain about Trinity falsehoods. I am making points, slowly but surely...and going right into the churches with a heart full of love. Awesome! You must try it.
I'm telling you, this is much more fulfilling than ever before, going door-to-door trying to convince these spirit-born Christians they are not to aspire to heaven, or have the spirit of Christ inside them, but follow some corporate newspaper publishers in Brooklyn to get the Gospel!
Look at the booklet,' Return to Jehovah'. I counted some 147 times 'Jehovah' was mentioned; Christ only a handful, 5, maybe. Yet the scriptures Meleti uses above are clear; Jesus plays the role. He is our Lord, God, also , just not Father Almighty. He wants to come inside us with his spirit and help us become just like him; in all our conduct;
"Put on the Christ",
"Christ in you"
"I will be with you"
"If you ask anything in my name, I will grant it." John 14:14
I know this sounds weird to your ears as a JW. But, the words of Christ and the Apostles come directly from Father Jah. "Just as I hear, I speak, Jesus said."
What I had to do, was get other Bibles, such as the WT's own Kingdom Interlinear, word for word Greek translation; Wescott and Hort and put cotton in my ears....so to speak....and blot out everything WT had taught....and listen to Jesus' teachings, then Paul, Peter, etc.APOSTLE JOHN (Big Time that gospel)
Then ...I began to wake up.Reply by katrina on 2017-04-17 02:00:17
I have got into trouble over this issue of Christ being our only leader as Jehovah has given him all authority in heaven and on earth, I have been accused by a relative as being pro trinity, its this trinity obsession that JW have going on give more emphasis on Christ then your bending towards apostasy.
It is apparent to me that the past decade Christ is being pushed aside in favour of the GB rulers and organization, to me the org is Jehovah to JW. And dare I say it appears to be more anti Christ.Reply by Kopernicus on 2017-04-17 08:54:58
Spot on katrina. For recent evidence merely look at the 2017 Memorial invitation (no emblems or portrayal of Jesus) and the 2017 convention programme (GB member prominently pictured).
Yes indeed, the GB are elevating themselves and discounting Jesus.
Comment by MarthaMartha on 2017-04-16 21:01:17
Thanks Meleti,
I've been waiting for this one.
You have managed to spell out the problems in this article comprehensively, with a suitable amount of indignance at the audacity of the writers.
When I read it I was outraged. How dare they?
It's funny that it's questioned whether Jesus can lead from heaven as an invisible spirit, needing visible representatives. There seems to be no such question when certain members of the GB are talking about their imminent ruling positions. ?
Your point about the UN affiliation and the comparison to Achan's sin and the subsequent removal of the spirit is intriguing. If the organisation ever did have Holy Spirit it would seem reasonable that it would be removed for that error. However, with the history of failed prophecies and cockeyed teachings throughout its history, can it be claimed that they have ever had God's spirit?
It seems to me that we have been lead from the start by a group of imperfect men who, for reasons I won't presume to say, have promoted their human ideas and interpretations and had the gall to claim superhuman influence. And I fell for it.
I much prefer Jesus' leadership.
Well done Meleti.Reply by tyhik on 2017-04-17 06:30:56
Hi MarthaMartha.
You said: "However, with the history of failed prophecies and cockeyed teachings throughout its history, can it be claimed that they have ever had God’s spirit?"
It's all speculation, but I tend to think that the Org as a congregation has never had support of the holy spirit. Because of the false prophecies and because of never apologizing for errors and never openly regretting them. There have been always individual bible students/witnesses who have had the spirit. However, doctrines like the one about the other sheep have made many to unknowingly, out of obedience to men, push effectively back that spirit. The clear manifestation of this is that only some 0.21% of witnesses partake of emblems. Which is an amazingly low percentage if you think about the dedication, effort and sacrifices witnesses make to serve God. Yeah, it seems that if one believes and preaches that spirit dwells only in elected few, but not in ordinary people like himself then the spirit is not going to argue with him. Why would the spirit want to dwell in such a person?
Reply by John S on 2017-04-17 08:39:44
"However, with the history of failed prophecies and cockeyed teachings throughout its history, can it be claimed that they have ever had God’s spirit? "
Priceless. Amen.
Comment by wild olive on 2017-04-16 21:43:01
As the article eloquently pointed out,where has there been any repentance? Not just from the UN fiasco,but at anytime?
In my 50 yr association I have never read an article or heard a talk that expressed any heart felt repentance,the kind you can read in pslm 51.
In the book of Rom 2:4 Paul is telling anointed Christians that god is leading them to repentance,this tells me that repentance is a process rather than a one off thing as presented by the JW religion,I also feel this is one of the major reasons why depression ,fear and anxiety are rampant in the organisation,because they are not taught the need for repentance,only following the lead that's been set by the GB,my two cents worth,a bit off topic,sorry
Comment by PoetryofProvidence on 2017-04-17 01:15:28
the whole of the Hebrew scriptures and the prophets mission was to lead us to the Christ as the answer to Adams Fall and that of mankind...Rev 19:10 and in this case I prefer the NWT " At that I fell down before his feet to worship him. But he tells me: “Be careful! Do not do that!all I am is a fellow slave of you and of your brothers who have the work of witnessing to Jesus. Worship God; for the bearing witness to Jesus is what inspires prophesying.” to repeat so that the whole of the scriptures prior to the arrival of the Messiah was for the purpose of leading us to him .
Comment by Kopernicus on 2017-04-17 04:49:26
I too have been waiting for the critique of this WT article.
Hebrews 1:2 eliminates the GBoJW from their self proclaimed role... "Now at the end of these days he has spoken to us by means of a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the systems of things."
Enough said!
Comment by Dajo on 2017-04-17 06:43:50
Thank you.
Before reading this review I read the WT study and also the simplified version.
To do that in parallel, it is simply a matter of going to WOLdotJWdotORG site (watchtower online) and going to the "calendar" or days text icon. Scroll down to the bottom and there is the weeks program with both vesions of the weeks WT program. Then open each version (WT Study & WT Simplified Study) in separate tabs.
Anyways, not to digress..
Excellent review Meleti and my hope is that some close to me will see through the article for what it is.
When they are ready I can then share some of what is available here.
Thank you for including a link to some of those valuable writings back 5 years. I am still reading and commenting on some of them.
Comment by Deo_ac_veritati on 2017-04-17 21:45:53
Hoo boy.... is this ever gonna be a heckuva two weeks for the Watchtower Study. Assuming I actually attend (which I'm still debating) I'll be lucky if I get out of there without being disfellowshiped, much less getting ushered into the infamous "back room."
It's remarkable to me, that as recently as 1981, the idea that the faithful and discreet slave represented the Governing Body only was considered an "apostate" notion. From the March 1, 1981 WT, pg 24-26:
"Witnesses of Jehovah understand that the "slave" is comprised of all anointed Christians as a group on earth at any given time during the 19 centuries since Pentecost. Accordingly, the "domestics" are these followers of Christ as individuals.
Some readers may feel that this is a rather sectarian view of matters. Or they may object to the idea that the "slave" and the "domestics" represent the same class, one as a composite body and the other as individuals. The objectors may argue that not all of Christ's anointed disciples have a share in preparing the spiritual food, so that perhaps the "slave" pictures only the leading ones, and the "domestics" those they serve in the congregation.
There is no point in trying to force an interpretation of the parable. Self-deception is of no benefit and is spiritually damaging. Therefore, we must look to the Scriptures for an understanding. In doing this, what do we find?
[ ... ]
Thus we see a clear Scriptural basis for saying that all anointed followers of Christ Jesus make up God's "servant," with Jesus as its Master." (emphasis mine)
My, how times have changed with new light. Truly, this defines the concept of being a Jehovah's Witness - it is not worship of Jehovah that is important, but the following of the FDS. Indeed, when faced with a judicial committee, the first and foremost question these days seems to be "Do you believe God is using the FDS as His only channel." I myself had this happen about a year or so ago. I innocently mentioned to an elder that I was chagrined that our CLAM meetings seemed to mention the Christ so sparingly, if at all. I did not criticize the Governing Body or the organization, merely mentioned that it was personally disheartening to me to not be studying Jesus more at a meeting labeled our "Christian Life and Ministry." For mentioning this, the elder asked me if my issue with the meeting was the "content" or the "method" (obviously, it was hard to answer such a close-ended question, when the answer was really neither - it was the lack of content. But, given the choices, I said "content." The next question out of the elder's mouth was "Do you have faith in the Governing Body?" It took me aback, but I looked him square in the eye and said "No, I do not." As his eyes widened, I noted to him, I have faith in God and his Son, the Christ, and their inspired word, the Bible, but I did not put faith in any men, as Psalms 146:3 advises. I noted that I had a certain amount of trust in the GB, but I did not put my faith in them (I didn't say how much trust, and luckily, he didn't ask), as that would be unscriptural, and that I accepted whatever they said as long as it was in line with scripture. I thought that would satisfy him, but about a week later, I found myself in the dreaded back room with two elders, once again being asked the same question (which elicited the same answer). That's what it always seems to come down to, no? Your faith in the FDS/GB. It's very sad.
Likewise, about six or seven months ago, when I had to have my WT comments "pre-vetted" by an elder, I was told I couldn't use one (specifics here are unimportant). I objected, but was reminded of the "how to give a good comment" guidelines and told that my comment exceeded 30 seconds (if I had a nickle for every time an elder's comments exceeded that arbitrary time limit, I'd be a very rich man). I noted that I was not personally happy with the way the WT format worked against me giving a good meaty comment. This was too much for the elder, who huffily stated "Well, I'm not going to stand here while you criticize the organization" and then stormed off (absolutely true story). Which flies in the face of what our own organization published in the September 8, 1997 Awake:
"There is nothing wrong with trying to refute the teachings and practices of a religious group that a person may feel is incorrect."
Well, unless of course, that religious group is the JWs as was clarified some years earlier in the May 15 1984 WT:
"Those who despise Jehovah's teaching include individuals who criticize and complain about Jehovah's clean organization and its rules for maintaining peace and good order. There is only a fine line of demarcation between such and those who are outright rebels." .
At the end of the day, the way Jesus' parable of the slave is being used by this organization is just plain wrong. Even with a literal interpretation, the Bible states that the appointment of the slave isn't until after the master arrives, as shown at Matthew 24:46,47:
"Happy is that slave if his master on arriving (erchomai) finds him doing so. Truly I say to you, He will appoint him over all his belongings."
Sigh.... I tire greatly of all this. Please, to all of you, say a prayer for strength for me. My teenage child has confided in me that he wants to leave "Jehovah's organization" - he/she knows there is much falsehood there - frankly, at times, I think she/he may want to leave God altogether, but that is another matter (he/she is a good kid, with a good heart). I have obviously given him/her my blessing, but being he/she is baptized it is not settling well with his/her mother, who is "all in" as I like to say. This is causing great conflict within the household, and much stress (man, it's telling about the organization when I have to use "his/her" and "he/she" just to avoid being identified). Thanks for your Christian love in advance.Reply by Menrov on 2017-04-18 08:27:57
Hi Deo_ac_veritati, your point: (man, it’s telling about the organization when I have to use “his/her” and “he/she” just to avoid being identified).
Exactly my point. A very non-Christian situation in my view. Take care !!
Comment by caasi notwen on 2017-04-18 17:45:03
Interesting how in paragraph 18, the GB unwittingly condemn themselves. After partially quoting Matthew 15:7-9 the question is asked- Could Jehovah really choose any of these men to lead his people? Take a look in the mirror, God's Word and see how you measure up guys!
Comment by AndereStimme on 2017-04-21 15:40:52
This week's article is nothing compared to next week's.
The Governing Body echoes the apostle Paul, who wrote: “These things we also speak, not with words taught by human wisdom, but with those taught by the spirit.” (1 Cor. 2:13)
Comment by huang on 2017-04-22 05:30:51
I am all set to comment at paragraph 1 & 2 as follows:
All denominations claim Jesus as their leader but at same time a single prominent man usually leads the church. Thus Pope Francis leads the Catholic Church, Archbishop Justin Welby the Anglican Church, Pres George Smith the Mormons.
JW's do not have a one-man leader like the Pope, Archbishop or President. Instead we have 7-man Governing Body, but they are not called our leaders
Jesus clearly referred to himself as the one and only leader of his disciples saying, "Neither be called leaders, for your Leader is one, the Christ.” (Mt 23:10)
Hope this sets off some critical thinking in the audience . Thanks Meleti for the powerful points.Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2017-04-22 08:01:37
You're welcome, huang.
They are careful not to use the term leaders when referring to themselves as that would be a blatant violation of the rule Jesus gave at Matthew 23:10. However, they come right up to the edge of making that assertion when they refer to their "leadership" and how we need to obey their direction no matter how 'unstrategic' it may appear. They walk like a duck and quack like a duck, but are very careful not to call themselves a duck. The brothers do not seem to grasp the point that "governing body" is not a term used in the Scriptures, because to do so would be to endorse men as leaders. Govern is defined as "conduct the policy, actions, and affairs of (a state, organization, or people)." Most telling is that synonyms for the word include "rule" and "lead". So by calling themselves the "Governing Body" they mean, the "Body of Leaders" or the "Ruling Body". So while trying to skirt the letter of Jesus' law, they violate the spirit of it.
Comment by James on 2017-04-24 10:47:07
Thank you for the review ,thanks to Jesus the head of the body for light that exposes darkness.
The first premise of the article: we are different from others because we cant point to one man or woman as our leader' as the simplified edition puts it in par 1 is false.
Some churches don't have a single individual leader, some have their our sort of GB.
Nevertheless, for the first 100yrs of our history we could actually point to an individual as our leader-the President of Watchtower was prominent and powerful-Russell,Rutherford (the Generalissimo),Knorr, Franz. Is only from about 1975 that governing power was in actuality transferred to a group. So we are not different from them as it is put out here in the article.
Why this level of manipulation, misrepresentation and deceit? Every Christian group has its group of human Leaders or Leader,yet they recongnize Jesus as the real Leader.
The shortcomings of the Isrealites leaders_Moses,Hezekiah,and others mentioned are to an extent understandable. They did not vacillate in doctrinal matters, they did not say something in Jehovah's name and later had to say "new light".The faults were mainly personal imperfection.But the GB faults are not just imperfections but speaking in Jehovah's name and turning out to be false.
This is a characteristics not of true spokesmen or Christ representatives.
A faithful and discreet slave that teaches the Heavenly hope ended in 1935 till it was reversed in 2007, over 70yrs speculation is not just imperfection but speaking what Christ have not ask them to speak, is not a discreet slave