[From ws1/18 p. 12 for March 5 – March 11]
“How good and how pleasant it is...to dwell together in unity!”—PS. 133:1.
We find immediate issues with accuracy in the first sentence of the opening paragraph where the claim is made that “'God’s people' will assemble for the memorial." That expresses an opinion of the organization rather than a fact. It would be accurate to say “Jehovah’s Witnesses” instead of "God's people".
The final sentence then states “Each year, this observance is the most amazing unifying event that takes place on planet Earth.”
According to Wikipedia at least, “The Arba'een Pilgrimage is the world's largest public gathering that is held every year in Iraq. And last year was estimated at between 20 and 30 million.”
Perhaps what is more important to our discussion here though is the claim that the observance is unifying.
At this point, we would invite comments from our readers. Does the highly formalized way the emblems are passed with no one partaking create a sense of unity? And how about the ritualistic manner in which the emblems are passed between the servers and the speaker? Does this evoke images of the loving manner in which Jesus introduced the "Lord's Evening Meal"?
Paragraph 2 opens by saying “We can only try to imagine how Jehovah and Jesus must rejoice as they observe hour after hour millions of earth’s inhabitants attending this special event until that day ends.” So let us examine this thought. What happens at the memorial? There is a talk, then a prayer and the bread is passed round, and then another prayer and the wine is passed round. But, except in very rare instances, no one partakes. Are Jehovah and Jesus happy with this? Let the words of Jesus himself answer. “Most truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves. He that feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has everlasting life, and I shall resurrect him at the last day;” (John 6:53-54). From this would you conclude Jesus is happy at the symbols of his body and blood just being passed round, rather than eaten and drunk? Or does it sadden him to see so many turning down the opportunity to obey his command.
The article then goes on to discuss the following four questions:r
- How can we individually prepare for the Memorial and benefit from attending it?
- In what ways does the Memorial influence the unity of God’s people?
- How can we personally contribute to that unity?
- Will there ever be a final memorial? If so, when?
This year we are not even treated to a flawed discussion on "Should we or shouldn't we partake?" and on what Jesus death means for us. No, it seems the most important point to take away from the memorial this year is “unity”.
So in paragraph 4 discussing question (1) they immediately try to guilt us into attending.
“Remember, congregation meetings are part of our worship. Surely Jehovah and Jesus take note of who makes the effort to attend this most important meeting of the year.”
The subtext to this sentence is: You are being watched from above. If you don’t attend, then you may go into Jesus' black book. Then they take off the cotton gloves:
“Frankly we want them [Jehovah and Jesus] to see that unless it is physically or circumstantially impossible, we will be present at the Memorial....When we show by our actions that meetings for worship are important to us, we give Jehovah added reason to keep our name in his ‘book of remembrance’ – ‘the book of life’“.
How this message from the organization contrasts to the message given by Jesus in the Scriptures. In John 4:23-24 Jesus says “the true worshipers will worship the Father with spirit and truth”. James wrote under inspiration in James 1:26-27 “If any man seems to himself to be a formal worshiper [going to 2 meetings a week, and the assemblies and memorial every year] and yet does not bridle his tongue, but goes on deceiving his own heart, this man’s form of worship is futile.” What type of worship was not futile? James continues “The form of worship that is clean and undefiled from the standpoint of our God and Father is this: to look after orphans and widows in their tribulation, and to keep oneself without spot from the world.”
Try as you will, you will not find one scripture that supports the idea that we need to meet to worship. Rather as Jesus said in John 4, it’s how we live our lives. Are we truthful? Do we teach truth? Do we display the fruits of the spirit? It is this display of the fruits of the spirit that shows our love, honour, respect and worship for our heavenly Father, not showing our faces at a meeting. Finally, being at a meeting, even the memorial will not lead to our being written in the ‘book of life’, if we ignore Jesus clear statement quoted above “unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves.”
Paragraph 5 suggests that “In the days leading up to the Memorial, we can set aside time to examine prayerfully and carefully our personal relationship with Jehovah (Read 2 Corinthians 13:5)”. We concur wholeheartedly with that statement. But I am sure our readers have already spotted the glaring omission. It is the Memorial of Christ's death. Why are we not also examining carefully our personal relationship with Jesus Christ, our Saviour and our Mediator? (1 Timothy 2:5-6, Acts 4:8-12)
After all, Israelites and then the 1st Century Jews might strive to have a personal relationship with Jehovah, but Jesus coming to earth and giving his life as a ransom sacrifice changed all that. John 14:6 quotes Jesus words saying “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” Therefore if we do not have a relationship with Jesus, how can we have a relationship with Jehovah?
The paragraph continues “How can we do that? By ‘testing whether we are in the faith’. To do that, we do well to ask ourselves: ‘Do I really believe that I am part of the only organization that Jehovah has approved to accomplish his will?” If only our dear brothers and sisters would actually take time to examine prayerfully and carefully this statement. Sadly most Witnesses will read this and automatically respond ‘Of course I believe that’ without thinking about the question: How and when did Jehovah clearly show he had approved the organization as the only one to accomplish his will? To which of course the answer is, there is no evidence he has chosen any particular organization currently on earth.
If the answer to this question is No, (which it certainly is on my part) then how can we answer the majority of the pointed questions that follow because they all involve compliance with the organization’s interpretation and requirements for doing anything? Such as “Am I doing my utmost to preach and teach the good news of the kingdom [according to the organization]?” We cannot preach and teach an incorrect version of the good news, we therefore need to ascertain what real good news the Bible gives us before we can preach it and teach it.
In the same line of thought, we have: “Do my actions show that I truly believe that these are the last days and that the end of Satan’s rule is near?” As Jesus clearly said in Mark 13:32 “No one knows the day or hour”. These may be the last days, or they may not be. No one knows. Nevertheless, we can show by our actions that we are true Christians regardless of where we are in God’s timetable.
The final question in this paragraph is “Do I have the same confidence in Jehovah and Jesus now that I had when I dedicated my life to Jehovah God?” The real question should be, ‘Do I have more confidence in Jehovah and Jesus?’ The answer to this question depends on a number of things.
- Have we personally made an in-depth study of God’s Word the Bible to understand for ourselves what it really teaches, the good news and what is God’s will for us?
- How much has the realisation that we have been taught untruths shaken our faith in God’s word?
- Have we learnt from the experience so that we always double-check properly in the Scriptures anything we are told?
We need to beware because the Organization's misdirection continues in paragraph 6 where we are encouraged to “read and meditate on Scriptural material that discusses the significance of the Memorial.” To do this would continue to fill our minds with the Organization's interpretation of these events. If we want accuracy and truth we should always go to the original witness (God’s Word the Bible) rather than through a third party, especially as the original witness is still available to us.
In paragraph 8 when discussing Ezekiel 37:15-17 and the stick for Judah and the stick for Joseph we are treated to another case of ‘When does a prophecy also have an antitype? Whenever it suits us, although we will say ‘Only when the Bible itself clearly indicates it’. This means that the organization hopes all Witnesses will swallow the fabrication hook, line and sinker by assuming that the Bible clearly indicates it is an antitype solely on the basis that the Watchtower says so. The first five paragraphs of the "Question from Readers" are okay, but the last four paragraphs are purely conjecture in an attempt to bolster the false teaching of two groups of righteous people (the anointed and the great crowd). The desperation to do this shows through with the statement of the final paragraph where it says “Although the ten-tribe kingdom does not usually picture those with the earthly hope, [we will make it do so this time to support our fallacious argument] the unification described in this prophecy does remind us of the unity that exists between those with an earthly hope and those with a heavenly hope.“ [words in brackets ours].
Paragraph 9 then makes more of this interpretation of Ezekiel suggesting that the “unity described in Ezekiel is clearly evident each year as the anointed remnant and the other sheep gather to observe the Memorial of Christ’s death!” Really? Most congregations do not have a member claiming to be ‘anointed’. In those that do have such a member in reality it can cause disunity because of the ‘celebrity status’ bestowed on the ‘anointed’ one as this can lead to others claiming ‘anointing’ to receive the same status. Of course, now there are also those of us who through prayer and conscientious study of God’s word believe that all true Christians should partake. (See this previous article for a more in depth discussion)
Once again we are reminded in paragraph 10 to cultivate humility. Sadly, it seems the Organization only believes developing this quality is of use in being able to “help us to be submissive to those taking the lead”. There is no mention of those taking the lead striving to maintain their humility and avoiding “lording it over those who are God’s inheritance, but becoming examples to the flock” (1 Peter 5:3) thereby making it easier for the flock to follow their lead.
The article then goes on to touch on the significance of the emblems used during the Memorial citing 1 Corinthians 11:23-25. In discussing these verses the article omits to highlight that Jesus said “Keep doing this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.” He did not say ‘Only you of the anointed should drink it, the great crowd should only watch it passed round.’
After encouraging us not to hold grudges and to try to be peacemakers to keep unity by forgiving our imperfect brothers and sisters, they quote Ephesians 4:2 to remind us we should be “putting up with one another in love”. That is what we should do as much as we can. However, it then goes on to make a generalization in paragraph 14 which most, if not all victims of child sexual abuse and grave injustices, would find hard to take. It says “In our congregations there are found all sorts of people whom Jehovah has drawn to him. (John 6:44) Since Jehovah has drawn them to him, he must find them lovable. How, then, could any of us judge a fellow worshipper as being unworthy of our love?” Here we face a serious question. It is true that Jehovah draws people to Jesus and himself as John 6 states. It is also a fact that good people can get corrupted by bad associations, even as did Adam and Eve and millions since then. Jehovah and Jesus have love for all mankind as they do “not desire any to be destroyed” and have provided the ransom so that all that repent of wrongdoing can have life everlasting . (2 Peter 3:9) However this does not mean that Jehovah finds a child molester (along with other serious sinners) as lovable simply because they are in the congregation. They have to repent and truly turn around. The very fact that they exist in the congregations of Jehovah’s Witnesses would argue against it being his organization. The verses in John 6 show that he draws people to himself and Jesus, there is no indication of any imperfect organization being drawn to him. There may therefore be fellow worshippers who either have not been drawn by God, but are there for their own selfish ends, and who are no longer worshipping God in spirit and truth.
In conclusion, yes, we should celebrate the Memorial, and meditate on what it means for us and our relationship with our saviour Jesus Christ. But as to it being a unifying event for Jehovah’s Witnesses, that is a highly questionable assumption.
Archived Comments
We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.
Comment by Devora on 2018-03-06 20:54:53
Deep Thanks to Tadua & All here,blessed with such insights,comments,as make me feel- acutely,brothers and sisters,each of your individual perplexities,and active pains;trauma...over what the org.covers up or dims;deflects(at the very least)our Lord's clear,simple direction to(as Robert pointed out)Actively partake;not'observe'. I too am torn this year over'attending'at the local hall;it'd be my 3rd year partaking at a hall(and harshly-outright'judged'for such,right after,in a previous hall).Last year at the new hall(&the only time I was there),the attendant actually gasped"no!"enough for others nearby to hear,as I reached for the cracker piece.I cannot describe fully how- a'flash'instantaneously appeared between us;my split-second gaze then up to his own face,but he literally jumped back,as I then partook..no issue with the cup.Afterwards he apologized,and we had a brief,pleasant interchange.(I have hope for that 1 younger Witness,a M.S.?-Can he keep and deepen his understanding of the significance of proclaiming our Lord's death-?in being within such a system of dictated belief?)...But even as we will partake(whether at a hall or privately),I pray that All of you here will experience the peace and joy in the act of it,& as Martha relates,in the deep meditations on the Beauties of what is Spirit and Truth...our Sacred Hope...Our affirmation comes from Christ not men.
Comment by Robert-6512 on 2018-03-04 16:15:14
So much flawed reasoning on the part of WT, and so little time to refute it. It's disheartening to even think about it, much less to feel obligated to pick this article apart and show up all of its shortcomings.
1. First, let's point out the obvious: Luke 22:19: "Keep doing this in remembrance of me." WT: 'Keep observing this, in remembrance of me.' In order for one's beliefs and actions to be "in the truth" you have to go back to the beginning and note the original command. That command is not being followed, but rather, an unscriptural substitute. Once that happens, it's all downhill from there. You cannot have "unity" and be in conflict with the scriptures at the same time. It won't work.
2. WT: “Remember, congregation meetings are part of our worship. Surely Jehovah and Jesus take note of who makes the effort to attend this most important meeting of the year.” "Remember"? I would "remember" a part of my "worship" if I read it in the Bible. As Jesus would put it, "truly I tell you", I don't recall ANY verse in the Bible that said "congregation meetings are part of our worship". Yes, it says to gather and encourage each other, but that verse in Hebrews says nothing about congregations or meetings. So, what exactly is it I am supposed to "remember"? Oh, yeah, some issues of the WT where the GB made such statements. Translation into plain English: "Remember, congregation meetings are part of the worship that we as WT and the GB established and decided were necessary, mostly to keep you all under our control."
3. WT: "Frankly we want them [Jehovah and Jesus] to see that unless it is physically or circumstantially impossible, we will be present at the Memorial….When we show by our actions that meetings for worship are important to us, we give Jehovah added reason to keep our name in his ‘book of remembrance’ – ‘the book of life’“. Translation into plain English: 'Show up for the Memorial or you will die. And, oh yes, have a nice day.' Seriously, WT? You want to encourage and promote unity by threatening people with death? I didn't think even you could stoop that low, but lately, you never cease to amaze me.
4. WT: "... we do well to ask ourselves: ‘Do I really believe that I am part of the only organization that Jehovah has approved to accomplish his will?” Such a loaded question. It's really a "two-fer" issue. Part (1) is: 'do I really believe the WT organization is the only religious entity that Jehovah has approved, regardless of the purpose it may undertake?' and Part (2) is: 'do I really believe I am a part of that organization?' Part (2) is interesting in its own right; I suspect a number of JWs would actually answer No. But the main question is Part (1). For anyone involved with WT who believes the answer to be Yes, I defy them to provide objective, convincing, incontrovertible proof to back it up their claim. If one cannot prove Part (1), Part (2) is irrelevant.
5. Tadua, you noted: The final question in this paragraph is “Do I have the same confidence in Jehovah and Jesus now that I had when I dedicated my life to Jehovah God?” The real question should be, ‘Do I have more confidence in Jehovah and Jesus?’
Yes, the real question SHOULD be that, but that's not the one asked. Why? Because if most JWs answered truthfully, would say that had LESS confidence, not more. WT knows this, and (I suspect) would be delighted if people kept even the SAME enthusiasm as before, if for no other reason than to stem its losses. Does that mean they actually had less confidence in "Jehovah and Jesus"? Not necessarily, but they DO have less confidence in their human organization. After all, their dedication (a ceremony not scripturally required in the first place) was a dedication to a human organization - at least it became that after the baptism 'script' was changed in 1985.
6. WT (regarding the Ezekiel prophecy): "the unification described in this prophecy does remind us of the unity that exists between those with an earthly hope and those with a heavenly hope.“ It REMINDS us? So what? How does that fact that someone in the WT writing committee thinks that one thing REMINDS them of another have any bearing whatsoever on what this scripture means? There is utterly no relationship whatsoever between these two concepts, at least that I can see. This is extremely weak scholarship at best, and a distortion of the scriptures at worst.
It is a shame that the Memorial, something that ought to be inspiring and uplifting, is instead reduced to a form of 'command and control', in which WT imposes the theme of unity (and its cousin, loyalty) rather than obedience to a plainly stated scriptural requirement. Maybe all that is suppose to somehow transform this into a unifying event, but I seriously doubt it's the kind of unification that Christ had in mind.
Comment by Pekanman on 2018-03-04 15:29:18
Thank you Tadua for another great summary and break down of the watchtower. I found it shocking about he stress on unity and uniformity, obedience to the organization being most important, not the sacrifice our King made for us.
As a fairly new "woken" jw it is very hard to break the conditioning to not partake. It's actually scary to think of, shows how deep life long indoctrination runs. I don't know what I will do this year but partaking in front of others I am not sure I am ready for. But Jesus own words bring out we should so ai will be honest and just say I am confused about how to handle this. This is a matter for more prayer and research.
Thank you all, especially Tadua and Meleti for sharing your thoughts and wisdom.Reply by Truthsearcher on 2018-03-04 17:50:50
Hi Pekanman. I know what you mean about the memorial. I was off the same mind until a couple of months ago. Not sure where you are in the world but there is an excellent UK website that discusses the Memorial. It is http://reachouttrust.org/watchtower-memorial-meal/
Let me know what you think.Reply by Robert-6512 on 2018-03-05 22:51:31
I looked the UK site you mentioned. While it aptly points out problems in WT doctrine, I found much of its reasoning to be flawed. For instance, they take the verse that says "all have sinned and fallen short of God's glory" and take that to mean if Jesus were a man then he sinned too, so either Jesus sinned or he wasn't a man. I wasn't real impressed with this man.
Reply by Truthsearcher on 2018-03-06 09:44:41
Thank you for reading my post Robert-6512.Again, I was just trying to be helpful. Please see my previous posts. Coming from a born again hippie of 60 years of age and in the words of our British pop group 'all you need is love'. (I hope nobody takes that too seriously - British humour).
Reply by MarthaMartha on 2018-03-08 04:30:18
Welcome Truthsearcher, it's good to see another English member here. I'm also 60, brought up as a JW and recently awoken.
My story is very much like yours, although mine started 5 years ago.
Those of us who have found our way to Beroeans have a deep love for truth, and you are one of us. Those of us that have been badly treated in 'the truth' are very sensitive to any perceived coercion or pressure. Im glad you were able to express your feelings and that you and Tadua were able to settle it in such a Christian manner. It's actually heartwarming for me to see this in action.
We also have highly sensitive critical thinking abilities honed to the maximum ??
So I read the article you linked to... I think I've read some of that website before.
I found the first part a bit questionable myself, but I did like the paragraph on the new covenant and how WT has created an ' other sheep class' that are essentially nonentities in the context of the new covenant. Some of Meleti's articles have expressed the same point that' WT have essentially shut the door of the Kingdom to the majority of its members.
Anyway what I wanted to say is that, using our critical thinking abilities, we can read information from many sources and examine it, gleaning what we can prove to be true from scripture.
So I'm glad you posted the link, thanks. It was interesting.
I also understand why Tadua added a warning.
Maybe it did seem a bit heavy handed ( sorry Tadua! ?) but we all make mistakes, me included. Especially in print when we can't see the facial expression or the twinkle in the eye. ?
" all you need is love" doo de doo de doo ?
Now I have an ear worm....
With love,
Martha
Somewhere in England humming Beatles tunes.Reply by Truthsearcher on 2018-03-08 05:07:46
Martha, thank you for your very kind reply. It uplifted me.
After 18 months of not associating with the congregation I am hearing of more and more with horror stories. I am truly sorry that you too have experienced bad things in the org.
I started to read Watchtower literature at a young age.
I was extremely busy in the congregation and was traveling at 100 mph. I then, almost suddenly, hit a brick wall. It hurts. My wife and I have heard both sides of the coin for many of the subjects that were considered not scriptural, i.e. trinity, blood transfusions,etc. We have now come to the decision to partake of the bread and wine, but only because our concience allows us to based on the scriptures. This is the basis for any other subject that comes up. I believe, rightly or wrongly, that a person can become so wrapped up with heavy debates that we miss the real meaning of the scriptures and what Jesus taught. This is, I believe, how some JWs have become in regards to the ministry. Door knocking seems to be the only thing that matters.
Anyway, thanks again. You have cheered me up. From a rainy Yorkshire I wish you well and look forward to your posts. Take care.Reply by MarthaMartha on 2018-03-08 09:08:11
Well there you are.... Yorkshire! ?
I'm a Yorkshire girl born and bred; but I was uprooted and moved to Cheshire in my late teens, which turned out fine actually because I met my lovely husband and here I stayed.
Yorkshire's still in me old bones though.
At least it's raining now, not more snow!
Greetings to you both from Cheshire.
Reply by Tadua on 2018-03-06 03:56:33
Hi everyone
Be aware that “ Reachout Trust is a British evangelical Christian organisation. Its stated aims are to "Examine in the light of the Christian gospel the beliefs and spirituality of people within the cults, occults, new age and all not upholding to biblical truth."
Despite this claim much of the article you cite is full of assumptions and assertions without scriptural backing, much like the wt in fact.
They are not searching for truth, they believe they have it including the Trinity.
P.s. To avoid any misunderstanding the intent of the last sentence was to say ‘The writer of the article does not seem to be searching for truth, but rather seems happy with most of what mainstream Christianity teaches including the trinity.’Reply by Truthsearcher on 2018-03-06 06:27:22
Hello Tadua
First of all I would like to thank you for a very enjoyable and helpful article.
I have to say that I found your reply very distasteful and not helpful to me. Please let me explain.
I have been a JW for 40 years. Nearly two years ago my wife and I suffered terribly from things that happened within the local congregation. We were pushed into a corner. We then started to ask questions and because the elders were not helpful we looked for answers in God's word and elsewhere, Beroeans.net being one of them. I have just joined this forum and thought I would write my first post. I could relate to what Pekanman said and so I thought I would share something that I had found helpful. Michael Thomas who wrote the article I linked to is a lovely person and has certainly been helpful to my wife and I. Certainly more than any JW had been in England. You say, 'They are not searching for truth, they believe they have it including the Trinity.' Michael Thomas was a Mormon before becoming a Christian and so his idea of a Trinity was different to what it is now. Personally speaking, I have not accepted the trinity. Whether I do our not some time in the future is a personal matter. Your comment sounded very similar in attitude to the Watchtower and our local elders attitude. I would have preferred, if it is possible, for you to have contacted me privately. It certainly would have been more Christian but obviously you wanted your thoughts to be aired publicly. As I say, my wife and I have had a tough time, so much so that my wife had two strokes and my health has deteriorated. We don't need an attitude like yours when you said, 'they are not searching for truth'. I highly respect your article and if in that or any other article you have done I respect your opinion and would never display a bombastic attitude. Thank you for knocking my struggle in awaking from the JWs.Reply by Tadua on 2018-03-06 07:50:52
Hi Truthsearcher
Firstly I would like to offer my sincerest apologies for any upset I may have given you. That was never my intention.
I am also very sorry for the way you were treated in your local congregation and have no wish to compound the hurt from that.
I fully understand you are trying to help others as we all are. The comment was not intended as a criticism of yourself, it’s purpose rightly or wrongly (in retrospect perhaps the latter) was simply to inform any potential readers of the link as to what type of material they would find.
My comment should have been better worded. I can categorically say that when I wrote “they are not searching for truth” I was referring to how the article came across to me, I was not referring to your good self. My family and I have also suffered at the hands of the organization and perhaps was overprotective in my desire to protect others from being potentially misled again.
Please be assured of my best intentions at all times as we strive to free ourselves from the damage done to us by many of the WT organization’s teachings. Once again I apologise for unwittingly giving any offence.Reply by Truthsearcher on 2018-03-06 09:27:09
Thank you Tadua and I appreciate your apology. Coming out of the JWs and as I am presented with doctrines it is apparent that there are often good arguements for both sides of the coin. I am firmly of the opinion that I will have to go with my concience and leave our creator to do the judging. As far as I understand things, love is the greatest command and yet it seems to be lacking more and more. We see that situation within the Watchtower where adhering to doctrines is necessary despite what our concience might dictate. Again' thank you for your apology and I am truly sorry that you and your family have had a bad time in the 'truth'. I look forward to reading your next article. Take care
Reply by Tadua on 2018-03-04 18:39:05
Hi Pekanman
You should follow your conscience and move at your own pace. You need to be convinced in your own heart first. If it helps, Partaking was the hardest thing for me too. The first year I didn’t partake even though I was beginning to realise I should. But Since then I have not attended the memorial in my home congregation and have partaken privately at home. Partaking at the congregation would be like a red rag to the local elders. Besides which, listening to their talk with all its teachings I now know to be false would ruin the whole evening for me. You have the best attitude, prayer and research for yourself. Our Father and Jesus our Lord both understand our predicament and know our hearts. They know that we love them and how difficult it is to break habits and practices of a lifetime. We as imperfect humans have no right to judge the conscience of others, despite what the organization might teach.Reply by MarthaMartha on 2018-03-05 06:01:06
Same for me, Tadua.
I have partaken privately at home for two years now, this will be the third but I won't be attending the JW memorial this year as I've stopped attending.
This will come as a big shock to family and friends, as I guess there's a general supposition that although I might not attend meetings I would still attend the memorial.
Pekanman, Tadua is absolutely correct, you must follow your own pace and do as your conscience leads you. I knew I should partake for two years but couldn't bring myself to do it at the KH. I mulled it over for many months and decided if I partook at the JW memorial I would be doing it according to their doctrines and making it seem as though I was of the class they believe in.
So I attended as an observer to the JW memorial but partook of the emblems at home, and it was strange at first, but now I really look forward to that time of reflection and devotion and quiet contemplation. It means so much more than the weird ritual at the KH, which for my whole life I felt was strange and not how Jesus meant it to be.
Jesus sees us and knows our hearts.
Tadua, your article is just right. I'm enjoying your work.
Thank you.
Pekanman, stay strong and endure. We're all with you.
With Love
MarthaReply by Tadua on 2018-03-05 06:15:51
I wholeheartedly agree with you MarthaMartha
Reply by wild olive on 2018-03-07 23:41:03
You make some fine points Martha, by doing it the way the org specifys are you indeed going along with something false? My answer would be yes.
I pondered the same thing, as what I don't want to do is create a spectacle , but that's what it becomes by default.
I personally don't hold to the idea that it has to celebrated on a specific day , Jesus did so to finish up up the old covenant, but Paul was dead set against going back to Jewish traditions, so I feel this gives me permission to celebrate christs sacrifice at any time, and I often do when I feel Ime been attacked by satan, I have my own little ceremony in my workshop when ever I feel the need , I see the whole thing as a blessing to apprehend rather than a ritual to observe, just an opinion .Reply by MarthaMartha on 2018-03-08 09:34:47
I agree, WO, I love my little ceremony, it has much more meaning to me.
It's amazing how often JWs are persuaded into keeping the old law alive by the GBs attachment to it.
The gymnastics they go through to make it still apply makes me gasp. Not in admiration.
I understand what it says in Romans about the things that happened before being a warning to us... But I take that to mean how people acted and the outcome, is something we can learn from. I can't see it meaning that we should forever use the old law as a measure of what Jehovah wants, especially as he sent his son to make it invalid. It's a bit rude in my opinion. Like saying " ah yes Jehovah, but we think it still applies". Scary stuff.
I can't imagine Jesus intending his followers to be shackled by old law dates since he came to fulfil and make it obsolete. My husband pointed out that Paul did refer to Jesus as " our Passover" ... Fair enough, but I think it was more in the context of this being the final and complete Passover lamb. The fulfilment.
I'm not sure either way, and I don't think we'll be judged for celebrating often or annually. The point is that we " keep doing this".
It was a really difficult thing to wrestle with for me. Almost as difficult as sorting the blood issue in my mind.
However it all seems very simple now. I partake because Jesus asked us all to do so to proclaim him until he comes. Where I end up after judgement day is unimportant to me.
Well actually I would prefer earth as I hanker after a sea view one day and certainly have no desire to rule or judge anyone...so I'm trusting and hopeful but not arguing.
?Reply by wild olive on 2018-03-09 04:27:35
Love what your saying Martha.
I can understand the conflict you have felt over partaking and also the blood issue, but in the final analysis,we have this confusion because of WT teaching , certainly not from the persons of Jehovah or Jesus.
It amazes me that despite all that's been taught and said about Jesus , and Ime including other denominations besides JWs, that no one seems to be able to just stick with his simple commands and guidelines , it almost seems that the imperfect ego always overrides the straight forward and basic things that Jesus taught , which gives me a clearer understanding of when Jesus said that we do need to be like children.
Also love what you said about having a sea view, I do property maintence for a living , and were I am is all ocean views, one thing I can guarantee you , is if you have a sea view , then you will spend the rest of your life with a hammer and a paint brush in your hand, that darn sea air corrodes and degrades everything ?
And funny you should say that that you don't want to rule or judge anyone , neither do I , and I would think it's a fair assumption that no one else on this site does either, I would venture to say that if a person did , then they don't know Christ or recognise their own sin and shortcomings.
As for my own private ceremony, many times I have sat with tears in my eyes contemplating the steep and heavy price that was paid by Jehovah and Jesus , and it's all for me , what else is there to want ?
Reply by Astoriaboy on 2018-03-05 18:42:57
I began partaking in 2016, Pekanman, and my life has changed drastically since then. The so-called Elders in my congregation immediately started looking at me with suspicion and doubt. The GB is partially to blame for this, in my opinion. They published an article a few years ago implying that we were "mentally diseased". I was instructed not to make my "anointed status" known to congregation members, as this would be drawing attention to myself. I responded that those who have an "earthly hope" are always talking about it, so why shouldn't I speak of mine, the only real scriptural hope. I even cited Hebrews 10:23. They didn't want to hear it, and I was told I wasn't showing proper humility. So, I can't offer prayer on behalf of the congregation any more; barred from reading the Watchtower; not allowed to study the Bible with anyone attending the meetings. I don't want to partake with my congregation this time around because I don't want to be served by men with "dirty hands". So, I'm simply going to go somewhere else. Obeying Acts 5:29 does come at a price, but it's a very cheap price.
Reply by wild olive on 2018-03-06 23:52:45
Hi Astoriaboy
Well haven't you been put in a box ?
Listening to how the elders have treated you brings back memory's for me. Way back in the 70s I used to hear of similar incidents . One brother I knew who was anointed was disfellowshipped 3 times and reinstated after approximately 2 month waiting periods, I could never understand why this was happening because he was a spiritual giant with a grown family in the truth, I now know its because he was challenging false teaching in the watchtower. Now it's reached the stage that any non conformity , meaning do as everyone else is , basically is the beginning of sin in the eyes of the " loving" shepherds.
My wife asked me if I was partaking this year and I told her yes, a strained discussion ensued , so I offered would she prefer I didn't go ? as I could have my own ceremony at home in my workshop, the look on her face was priceless , she couldnt bring herself to tell someone not to go to the memorial, so she has to go along with it, I think I may even tell one of the elders beforehand what Ime going
to do just to see what comes
out of it.
But really one should not have any of this stuff as issues , but in the watchtower world it is. And it is going to be a witness against all when Christ arrives.Reply by Leonardo Josephus on 2018-03-07 11:10:21
You are one brave olive, WO.
Reply by Astoriaboy on 2018-03-11 17:24:19
Thank you so much, wild olive, for your encouraging reply. I was baptized in 1969, and served as an Overseer for many years. I had to give up my position for health reasons, but I continue to assist the friends any way I can. A brother asked me to help him prepare for baptism. He said the Elders had given up on him because he didn't understand the question and answer format in the Live Forever and God's Love books. I agreed, and informed the COBE of my intent. He said he didn't have a problem with it. When the Elders learned I was just using the Bible without one of the society's publications, they insisted I cease and desist. I was accused of trying to draw disciples away after myself. I told them the Bible itself is a publication, and an inspired one to boot. They didn't want to hear it, and said my anointing shouldn't make me think I'm "gifted or "special". It's been an upward battle for me ever since. The friends think I've done something wrong because they don't see me doing anything in the congregation. I've been black listed for no scriptural reason. I feel as Elijah did in 1 Kings 19:4, but Our Father reminds me that "7,000", like yourself, wild olive, have not bent the knee to Baal. Thanks again.
Reply by wild olive on 2018-03-13 23:32:59
Glad I could be of encouragement to you AB, I feel what your going through for the sake of real truth, Ime so glad to hear that your still in there for the bro and sis, others have left when faced with the same circumstance as yourself , and I don't blame them, but ,love for others no matter how unfavourable , is the gauge of true Christian love , and you are upholding it , Ime trying to do the same and it is hard , putting up with the hypocrisy and wrong teachings that are dished up at every meeting , but in the end we will prevail , not because we are right , but because Jesus makes us righteous (Rom 10:3&4) not the organisation.
Reply by Phelps on 2018-03-07 19:27:45
Ánimo querido hermano cristo esta contigo .Este año será mi primera vez. ..Tengo miedo pero cristo será mi poder y fuerza
Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2018-03-07 22:18:33
Fuerza y corage, mi hermano. Cristo esta contigo.
Reply by Astoriaboy on 2018-03-11 19:13:50
Seria muy facil abandonar esta congregacion para otra. Pero, no soy cobarde, y dejar mis hermanos queridos en estos tiempos dificiles seria aun peor. Lo Siento por la gramatica tan mala, y
gracias por todo.
Comment by James on 2018-03-06 12:17:12
Thanks for the review and all the comments.
This article is another nail in the control system, this control system is so effective that majority of jw don't care to reason on it, they swallow every bit of information from GB hook line and sinker.
Their thinking faculty is on a default setting: listen(to GB), obey (GB), and be blessed.
Despite apostle Paul, Peter, John's warning to "make sure of all things", " another good nnews", "false teachers", " not to believe all inspired sayings " but to examine if it conforms with the Scripture, making it a personal responsibility, JW have handed over that responsibility to others.
This default setting in the minds of most JW will make them accept ANY "new light".
Take for example, by same time 2019 watchtower publishes a " new light" that all jw can now partake of the emblems. Something like:
" "we previously believe only 144000 should partake of the emblems, however as Jehovah continue to make the light brighter (Prov 4:18), we have come to understand that all of Jehovah's people should partake, those of the heavenly or earthly
hope.... How can Jehovah's people know if they should partake? Read 1 Cor 11:28,29. Note that a "man should approve himself after scrutiny and only then let him eat" Also verse 29 says "discerning the body", so each baptized witness of Jehovah will do a personal scrutiny. This brings to us the need to avoid secret sins, anyone who commits gross sin and have not call the elders for help(James 5:14-15) will not qualify. Likewise, any who is disfellowshipped, currently reproved, or under restrictions will not qualify to partake.
The 144000, are to serve as kings and priest with Christ, the Other Sheep will live in a paradise new earth. All who are living up to their dedication and baptism are to partake""
An article of this nature will not be questioned by jw but swallowed hook, line, and sinker, it will be "new light" After a few months or years, more scriptures will be thrown in to "solidify" the "new light".
This is just to illustrate how easily the default setting works
This is "Pleasant Unity"
Bear with my ranting.
Comment by Psalmbee on 2018-03-04 09:59:48
I think I been to 3 memorials my whole life and every time I went I felt like a fish out of water. Last year I went and what I observed was Satan's deeply planted roots, the way they all turned their nose from the wine and the bread, it seemed like they couldn't pass it fast enough. I think it was about 25 years ago when I attended one before that and I seen 1 older man partake.
Keep doing this in remembrance of me is what the scripture says, but they keep doing this in remembrance of the organizations twisted doctrine.
I have to admit that they are some of the nicest people you will ever meet, but at the same time some of the most misguided. There was one brother there that was so overjoyed that I had showed up last year he almost cried and I could tell that it was real emotion being displayed, I really didn't know what to make of that but it did make me feel sorry for him.
Comment by wild olive on 2018-03-04 16:50:11
It is amazing what unity can do.
Israel unitedly made a golden calf and started worshipping it, they also unitedly demanded a human king, they also unitedly demanded Jesus be executed, and on memorial night they will unitedly reject the new covenant ,yes unity is a wonderful thing.
Comment by if ever on 2018-03-04 22:37:35
Hello all,
Thanks Tadua for your review. One point I noted was in the opening sentence in paragraph 9 of the wt study it says “9 From the year 1919 onward, Jehovah first gradually reorganized and reunited the anointed, who were symbolically like the stick “for Judah.”” Ephesians 5:23 says that Christ is head of the congregation. If any reorganising was done wouldn’t it be by Jesus and not Jehovah?
Comment by Leonardo Josephus on 2018-03-05 06:05:47
Hi Tadua. What an excellent dissection of the article on unity, sorry, the memorial.
Both this week and last week, and goodness knows how many other articles recently, we are treated to the reminders (Para 12,13) to be forgiving, to be peacemakers. Is there really such a serious problem in the congregations ?
Yet we could easily discuss the importance of truth (Eph 4:15), or maybe some details about the memorial, such as how it was an identifying mark for all first century Christians, how passing it among each other (Luke 22:17) was meant with the intention of sharing the bread and wine.
Instead we focus on unity, which is another way of telling us not to step out of line.
Paragraph 9 mentions about how the two groups became one flock. You have covered most of this, Tadua, but I thought that, among JWs, it was all one flock in the first place until 1935 divided them into anointed and other sheep, and in more recent times into "sons of God" and "friends of God".
And of course we have two bold statements. "God's people" (paras 1 & 8) and in para 5 "Do I really believe that I am part of the only organization that Jehovah has approved to accomplish his will". To add to your comments, perhaps we should ask Brother Jackson to explain how we can be the only organization that Jehovah has approved, and yet be presumptuous in making a remarkably similar statement to the Canada Supreme Court.
Comment by Alithia on 2018-03-05 06:38:16
As one born into the "truth" At around the age of 30 when I began to seriously question things around me in the congregation,I began to wonder at the tradition of passing around the emblems at the Memorial. I asked many a "mature Brother" including Circuit Overseers as to the origins and the necessity of doing this, why we did this,what was the point, what was the significance of the exercise? I would say what would be the difference of just leaving them all on the table on the platform? As there was, most of the time nobody ever there that was going to partake of them anyway. I would wonder at the ones around me earnestly being sure just to handle the emblems and pass them around to the person next to them, and the servants being diligent, even awaiting ones to return from the bathroom to be sure they touched the emblems, as if it was an act of great and essential importance! There was a great effort to reach ones who were unable to attend due to sickness such as being in the hospital, or otherwise indisposed so they too could touch the emblems, on this special evening, as if it was an act of great devotion.
Then came out a question from readers in the early eighties explaining if one of the anointed did not for one reason or another partake in the ceremony they should observe it exactly one month later. All based on some assumption related to the Passover explained in the Mosaic Law????? Then shortly afterwords another question from readers came out and stated that if one missed the occasion on the day, it was fine and Jehovah knows hearts and so it did not matter at all! Confusing to say the least! See Belated observance. W 93 2/1 31 Last paragraph. Poor old other sheep. A very underwhelming explanation of the matter when this comes after reams of sub headings in the publications index dealing with experiences of ones putting their lives at risk just to celebrate formally on the day and in the manner it is supposed to according to the Organisation! Very contradictory and confusing I might say!
I copy and paste from the above quote.
“Frankly we want them [Jehovah and Jesus] to see that unless it is physically or circumstantially impossible, we will be present at the Memorial….When we show by our actions that meetings for worship are important to us, we give Jehovah added reason to keep our name in his ‘book of remembrance’ – ‘the book of life’“.
Now read the last paragraph from the past question from readers and see, I think the trivialization of having missed the formal memorial celebration if of the other sheep.
"Those who are of Jesus’ “other sheep” class, with the hope of everlasting life on a paradise earth, are not under command to partake of the bread and the wine. (John 10:16) It is important to attend the annual celebration, but they do not partake of the emblems. So if one of them is sick or is traveling and thus not with any congregation that evening, he or she could privately read over appropriate scriptures (including the account of Jesus’ instituting the celebration) and pray for Jehovah’s blessing on the event worldwide. But in this case there is no need for any additional arrangement for a meeting or a special Biblical discussion a month later".???????????
With respect to the info from question from readers above. No passing around of the emblems. No one to pass to or someone else to pass to oneself. Apparently if we are in transit at an airport or jetting to a holiday destination we have special dispensation by Jah? Even if as described in the article above the explicit imperative of us supposedly having to be at the memorial sitting in-line having passed to and passing the emblems around in a formal tradition???
Hey I note you quote above from James 1:26. one of my most favorite scriptures. Compare with the latest version of the "silver sword". Its different. When the commentary on the book of James came out I devoured it. I loved it and I did not know just why. People around me did not share the same enthusiasm for the information and I just didn't get it. Years later now I know why. The people responsible for producing it. Any way see the latest version of the silver sword and you will find that this lovely scripture has been edited to remove the aspect of formality or religiosity in ones service to God. I wonder why. Could it be the the organisation is rife with such formalities?The latest version only says "if any man thinks he is a worshiper of God". No mention of religion or a formal worshiper. I think the organisation realizes this scripture does a disservice to themselves in the correct way this scripture was explained and translated in earlier versions of the NWT of the bible. See this scripture as it is discussed in the commentary of James book. I think they do not like to draw attention to this point which the Memorial really is for most who attend! No wonder the Commentary on James is mostly Taboo. I wonder why they have not eliminated it from the library after all of the drama surrounding its production.
Nice work Bro Tadua.
Comment by Candace on 2018-03-05 08:50:34
So I heard that the memorial's sequel a.k.a the 'special talk' is going to be a video broadcast this year. I hope someone interesting to watch like brother Lett would be starring in it. Otherwise I like to vote for Caleb and Sophia: the movie so at the very least we can all stay awake instead of taking a sneaky naps when the lights dim down.
Reply by Astoriaboy on 2018-03-05 18:17:19
Good point, Candace. It was also mentioned that this talk would serve the purpose of showing Elders how public talks are supposed to be given. So, it becomes an instructional video, taking the focus off our Lord Jesus Christ.
Comment by Menrov on 2018-03-05 13:54:39
The event is called Memorial Observance (not sure if it was always called that way). In other words, it is to observe as spectator the memorial.....how can one explain this? Either it is a memorial or not. It now has become an event that one can observe. Actually, if that is the case, you do not have to be there...you could observe it from anywhere... right?
How can they call themselves a Christian organisation if they are not even able to organize a proper memorial for the death of Jesus and have all participating or partaking in the event.
Comment by Astoriaboy on 2018-03-05 17:42:53
Par.5-How do they explain GB member Geoffrey Jackson's answer to the ARC that it would be presumptuous to conclude that we, (JW's), are the only ones God is using as his spokespersons? I'm tempted to give this comment at the meeting.
Reply by wild olive on 2018-03-13 23:16:29
I feel sorry for poor old Geoffrey , he ran out of balls at the critical moment, Ime sure he's going to regret what he said that day.
Comment by billy on 2018-03-05 19:49:02
I partake at home by myself as I don't know any others who I can share the memorial with in this way - I don't attend meeting s anymore
When I did attend the Kingdom Hall for the memorials they always lacked in enthusiasm and soulfulness - over the years when I had invited friends to come along , they commented to me how confusing and low energy the service was and had no inclination to go back
I also have wonderered why such a big effort the organization asks the b&s to invite the public - as the original last supper was between Jesus intimate friends
Comment by Gogetter on 2018-03-05 22:12:07
To address some of the questions brought up here on this subject we only need to consider the methods of control that the organization has incorporated over the decades. The memorial being just one of many.
The memorial has just been another way to install control and obedience.
1- The talk reinforces the two class system every year to the R&F and preps any new ones and Bible studies who may show to start thinking in this manner.
2-The brothers passing the emblems are an intimidation tool as they are watching for partakers.
3- The Group peer pressure “not to partake” cuz nobody else is.
4- highly effective in elevating the Anointed above the Christ with the majority in attendance as just observers. ( not supported by scripture)
Then we have the newest addition the special talk not after the memorial
But, The week before entitled “ Who really is Jesus Christ” and I predict
This talk will also reinforce the two class teaching and who should NOT
Partake. ( I mean they gotta do something about those increasing numbers every year ) Just another way to prep the masses of “observers” that will attend,listen,obey and be blessed.
And yes I sadly admit I’ll be in attendance with the masses of emblem passers.
Sorry for being so dark but since my awakening, the ARC scandal, UN NGO,
And the Nonsensical overlapping generations I see conspiracy with everything
JW
Comment by the voice on 2018-03-09 21:57:58
For a different perspective the apostles were not yet anointed on the night they partook. The anointing happened after his resurrection
Reply by mailman on 2018-03-11 20:10:20
Agree. Isn't it anointing of the apostles came on Pentecost when they along with the other disciples were filled by the Holy Spirit?
Hence, they were not yet technically anointed yet.
Jesus' invitation is so simple to reach the hearts of ordinary people yet the organization's leaders have made it complicated.
Reply by mailman on 2018-03-11 20:25:03
Our Lord said: Eat and drink. Governing Body aka Faithful and Discreet Slave: Watch and pass. Who shall we follow?
Comment by Bernardbooks on 2018-03-10 11:57:45
Paragraph 9 states:
“Now both groups serve unitedly under one King—the glorified Jesus Christ, who is prophetically spoken of as God’s “servant David.” (Ezek. 37:24,25)
(Ezekiel 37:24,25
My servant David will be their king, and they will all have one shepherd. They will walk in my judicial decisions and carefully observe my statutes. They will dwell on the land that I gave to my servant, to Jacob, where your forefathers lived, and they will dwell on it forever, they and their children and their children’s children; and David my servant will be their chieftain forever.
Insight 1 page 634 paragraph 4
In a similar prophecy, the references to David as being the king of this cleansed people and their “one shepherd” and “chieftain to time indefinite” clearly point to a greater fulfillment on the nation of spiritual Israel, the Christian congregation, under the anointed Heir to David’s throne, Christ Jesus. —Eze 37:21-25; compare Lu 1:32; Joh 10:16.
I wonder how the organization would explain how that detail of the prophecy regarding spiritual Israel “dwelling on the
land/earth forever” is fulfilled when they say a select group is separated and dwell somewhere else?
I personally feel that this prophecy in Ezekiel fits very well with Revelation 5:9,10.
“And they sing a new song, “Worthy you are to take the book and open its seals, because you were slaughtered and bought men for God with your blood out of every tribe and language and people and race, and made them a kingdom and priests for our God, and they shall reign on the earth.”Reply by Leonardo Josephus on 2018-03-11 07:41:02
Hang on a moment ! Who separated the anointed and the Great Crowd in the first place ?
In Israel it was the 10 tribe Kingdom which rebelled. In JW. Org it was the GB which made the divisions in 1935 and have persisted in dividing them ever since.
There is a parallel. Where is it ? It’s just a prophecy which was fulfilled many years ago.
Comment by Astoriaboy on 2018-03-10 23:25:10
Jesus' words to "Keep doing this in remembrance of me", has become a recruiting vehicle for the organization. People that we refer to as "wordly", all of a sudden become special targets for admission into the "only organization" being used by God today. Then we tell them that Christ is not their mediator; they're not in the New Covenant; not going to heaven; the Bible wasn't written for them; you get the picture. And those of us who are anointed are put under a gag order not to say anything about our hope. "Ambassadors substituting for Christ" are being told what to do by the local congregation "envoys". Ismael persecuting Isaac.
Comment by Amitafal on 2018-03-11 05:07:14
Thank you Tadua, and Eric for this site and clear reasoning on the scriptures.
Last year I couldn’t bring myself to attend the memorial being ‘awake’ to their false teachings and their ritualistic memorial meeting. This site has helped me to see that there is nothing wrong in partaking of the bread and wine. This year I plan to do so at home.Reply by mailman on 2018-03-12 00:56:59
Hi Amitafal. For 2-3 years already, a day before the Org's Memorial, we as a family did a re-enactment of the Lord's evening meal, the Memorial.
We prepared our own home-cooked unleavened bread. I let the children and my wife read passages from the Bible about Jesus and the occasion. We still remember watching Youtube videos about Jesus. Then finally we partake of the bread.
In essence, we did it successfully only it's outside of the walls of the Kingdom Hall. :)Reply by wild olive on 2018-03-13 23:10:26
Very nice you can do that as a family Mailman. There are a lot of good videos on YouTube dealing with Jesus, kinda makes JWorg a bit redundant .
Do you feel having your own family memorial has benefitted them in any specific way?
Comment by mailman on 2018-03-11 20:28:25
Thanks for sharing the experience. Will share it to a trusted friend. :)
Comment by wild olive on 2018-03-13 23:14:33
That was a fine witness Brain, maybe it will start some thinking and questioning.
One things for sure you honoured Christ and his command in front of men , heaven was listening.