[embed]https://youtu.be/JWmFejMKzSM[/embed]
This is the first video in a new series called “Bible Musings.” I’ve created a YouTube playlist under that title. I’ve been wanting to do this for some time, but there always seemed to be something more pressing to clear away first. There still is, and there probably always will be, so I decided to just take the bull by the horns and plunge ahead. (I’m sure some of you will point out that it is hard to plunge ahead when you’re holding a bull by the horns.)
What is the purpose of the Bible Musings video series? Well, how do you feel when you first get good news? I think for most of us, our immediate reaction is to want to share it with others, family and friends, for sure. I find as I study the Scriptures that from time to time, some new insight will hit me, some delightful little thought or maybe a clarification of something that had been puzzling me for some time. I’m hardly unique in this. I’m sure you find the same thing happens when you study God’s word. My hope is that by sharing my findings, a general dialogue will result wherein each will contribute his or her insights. I believe that the parable of the faithful and discreet slave speaks not of an individual or small group of overseers, but rather of the work that every one of us does by feeding others from our own knowledge of the Christ.
With that in mind, here goes.
What is the definition of Christianity? What does it mean to be a Christian?
A third of the world’s population claims to be Christian. Yet they all have different beliefs. Ask Christians at random to explain what it means to be a Christian and they will explain it within the context of their particular religious belief.
A Catholic will stay, “Well, here’s what I as a Catholic believe....” A Mormon might say, “Here’s what Mormon’s believe….” Presbyterian, Anglican, Baptist, Evangelist, Jehovah’s Witness, Eastern Orthodox, Christadelphian—each will define Christianity by what they believe, by their creed.
One of the most famous Christians in all of history is the Apostle Paul. How would he have answered this question? Turn to 2 Timothy 1:12 for the answer.
“For this reason, even though I suffer as I do, I am not ashamed; for I know whom I have believed, and I am convinced that He is able to guard what I have entrusted to Him for that day.” (Berean Study Bible)
You notice that he didn’t say, “I know what I believe…”
William Barclay wrote: “Christianity doesn’t mean reciting a creed; it means knowing a person.”
As a former Jehovah’s Witness, it would be easy for me to point the finger and say this is where JWs miss the boat—that they spend all their time focusing on Jehovah, when in fact they cannot come to know the Father except through the Son. However, it would be unfair to imply that this is a problem unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses. Even if you’re a “Jesus Saves” Evangelist or a “Born Again” Baptist, you will have to acknowledge that members of your faith focus on what they believe, not on whom they believe. Let’s face it, if all Christian religions believed Jesus—not believed in Jesus, but believed Jesus, which is a whole other thing—there would be no divisions among us.
The fact is that each Christian denomination has its own creed; its own set of beliefs, doctrines, and interpretations that cause it to brand itself as different, and in its adherent’s minds, as simply the best; better than all the rest.
Each denomination looks to its leaders to tell them what is true and what is false. Looking to Jesus, means accepting what he says and understanding what he means, without going to other men to get their interpretation. Jesus’ words are written down. They are like a letter written to each of us individually; but so many of us ask someone else to read the letter and interpret it for us. Unscrupulous men have throughout the ages taken advantage of our laziness and used our misguided trust to lead us away from the Christ, doing so all the while in his name. What irony!
I’m not saying that truth is not important. Jesus said that “the truth will set us free.” However, when quoting those words, we often forget to read the preceding thought. He said, “if you remain in my word”.
You’ve heard of hearsay testimony, haven’t you? In a court of law, testimony that is presented based on hearsay is usually dismissed as unreliable. To know that what we believe about the Christ isn’t based on hearsay, we need to listen to him directly. We need to get to know him as a person directly, not second hand.
John tells us that God is love. (1 John 4:8) The New Living Translation at Hebrews 1:3 tells us that “The Son radiates God's own glory and expresses the very character of God….” So, if God is love, so is Jesus. Jesus expects his followers to imitate this love, which is why he said that they would be recognized by outsiders based on their display of the same love he exhibited.
The New International Version at John 13:34, 35 reads: “As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” The corollary to this expression of our Lord can be stated thus: “By this everyone will know that you are not my disciples, if you do not love one another.”
Throughout the centuries, those calling themselves Christians have fought and killed others also calling themselves Christians because of what they believed. There is hardly a Christian denomination today that hasn’t stained its hands with the blood of fellow Christians because of differences of belief.
Even those denominations that do not engage in war have failed to obey the law of love in other ways. For example, a number of these groups will shun anyone who disagrees with what they believe.
We can’t change other people. They have to want to change. Our best way of influencing others is by our conduct. I think this is why the Bible speaks of Christ being “in” us. The NWT adds words not found in the original manuscripts so that “in Christ” becomes “in union with Christ”, thereby greatly weakening the power of that message. Consider those texts with the offending words removed:
“. . .so we, although many, are one body in Christ. . .” (Ro 12:5)
“. . .Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old things passed away; look! new things have come into existence.” (2 Co 5:17)
“. . .Or do you not recognize that Jesus Christ is in you? . . .” (2Co 13:5)
“. . .It is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who is living in me. . . .” (Ga 2:20)
“. . .Praised be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, for he has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, as he chose us to be in him before the founding of the world, that we should be holy and unblemished before him in love.” (Eph 1:3, 4)
I could go on, but you get the idea. Being a Christian means listening to the Christ, ideally to the point that people will see the Christ in us, just as we see the Father in him.
Let the haters, hate. Let the persecutors, persecute. Let the shunners, shun. But let us love others as the Christ loves us. That, in a nutshell, is the definition of Christianity, in my personal opinion.
Archived Comments
We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.
Comment by Andrew on 2019-01-18 14:29:07
Beautifully expressed and well written, Meleti!
My wife and I were just talking about this topic this morning! Very timely!
Truly, food at the proper time!
Russell often said that each Christian could be a "faithful servant." My wife and I believe that you really are.
Thanks for a great article!
You work is appreciated by more than you know!
Andrew
Comment by lazarus on 2019-01-18 23:25:04
Thank you Eric,
I had a discussion online on this topic. I was called a Heritic because of my beliefs. So almost in similar reasoning to yours above.
I asked the other person, Why the separation of the division in the body of Christ I asked? Isn’t because of beliefs? Was my question to the other person.
Truth is important but i raises the point that how many reformers objected to the Catholic Church’s teachings- who were called heretics and met a fateful end.
So, I like your reasoning- it was the point or conclusion I came to also. We should be united in Christ or even in “Union with Christ”- be it the phrase actually doesn’t appear in scripture. Depending on the biased translation one uses. So yes - in Christ is our basis of union as implied in faith.
Ephesians 3:17-19ESV
17 so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith—that you, being rooted and grounded in love, 18 may have strength to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, 19 and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.
Comment by jamesbrown on 2019-01-22 22:12:29
Hi Eric,
This is the third time I am posting this email, maybe you might be able to help:
A question was asked of me and I need your help:
Miracles of Jesus and that of the apostles, why doesn't first centuries historians report on them?
The ONLY record i found is in the bible.
The man didn't ask about historicity of Jesus and the apostles, just the miracles, why is the bible the ONLY source of reporting???
So, friends in keeping with the them:
Who Moulds Your Thinking?
Who really is, has and even still moulding my thinking???
Please help if you can
Eric, all the websites that I have Googled are saying:
Christianity is built on faith NOT facts.... Faith is very important, but then again so are facts.
I think of Gamaliel, first century historians wrote about him, and yet he was a teacher of the law, NOT a miracle worker.
Acts 5:15 They even brought the sick out into the main streets and laid them there on small beds and mats, so that as Peter would pass by, at least his shadow might fall on some of them. 16 Also, crowds of people from the cities around Jerusalem kept coming, carrying sick people and those troubled with unclean spirits, and they were one and all cured.
Not a wispier among the first century historians.
Vs 12 Moreover, through the hands of the apostles many signs and wonders continued to occur among the people....
Not a wispier among the first century historians.
Apostle Peter died in mid 60's, that means Peter was performing miracles up-to the time of his death, in harmony with the above scriptures.
Not a wispier among the first century historians.
The apostles were brought before Sanhedrin because of their TEACHING only, not because of miraculous works.
I think if I had such awesome power, to heal and resurrect people, and let’s not forget the imparting of the gift of tongues, in the name of Jesus Christ…... People will be kneeling before me NOT seeking to kill me, to the people I will be the Goose that lays the golden eggs
Hope to hear from youReply by Meleti Vivlon on 2019-01-23 08:17:36
The Bible says that the world is lying in the power of the evil one, so I doubt that Satan would be interested in publishing anything that would build up our faith.
You are right that at first a great healer would be welcome, but when one attacks the cherished beliefs of others, even when speaking the truth, their attitude changes. Moses freed the Israelites yet they turned on him. Jesus cured the sick, yet they killed him. The Sanhedrin could hardly accuse the apostles of the "crime" of healing others, but what concerned them was that they were contradicting the leader's teachings and making them look bad.
Reply by Warp Speed on 2019-01-23 10:20:00
Hi JB,
I would agree with Eric that it would not be hard to see why people would want to kill Jesus because He was "rocking the boat" and the Jewish religious leaders didn't want their authority challenged.
But, as regards to secular historians commenting on the apostles resurrecting others, it would appear at least from a "secular" view that there is in fact little (if any) corroborating evidence to support the accounts, other than the Bible itself.
So JB, I certainly am also intrigued by this "man's" question put to you. In my opinion, it is indeed a valid question to ask.
I find it very interesting (and perhaps very telling) that many of us here who have already awakened to the nonsense of the JW Cult were very slow to respond to your original post for over 2 days.( In fact at the time of this writing it has only just been Eric and now myself).
The reason I waited till now is that in your OP you were directing your question ( if I was understanding it correctly) initially to the "writers" of BP and then also opening up the question to the whole BP Community.
Awakening out of the Org, we all were looking for FACTS to clarify our perception of what TRUTH really is.
It would seem that the only viable (truthful) answer is that, yes, it boils down to having faith that these things actually occurred. That doesn't seem to be a bad thing to me, but I think we all need to be careful that we don't unintentionally mimic the Org's black and white/ us vs. them thinking.
Just my 2 cents- hope it helps JB.
Comment by cx_516 on 2019-01-23 00:52:09
Hey Eric, great article. I hadn’t entirely thought of things from this angle. Really look forward to more in this new category!
Cx_516