Let Us Not Revile Nor Judge

– posted by meleti

(Jude 9) . . .But when Michael the archangel had a difference with the Devil and was disputing about Moses’ body, he did not dare to bring a judgment against him in abusive terms, but said: “May Jehovah rebuke you.”


This Scripture has always fascinated me. If anyone deserves abuse, it would certainly be the Devil, would it not?  Yet here we find Michael, the foremost of the heavenly princes, refusing to pass judgment in abusive terms upon the original slanderer. Instead, he recognizes that it is not his place to do so; that to do so would be to usurp Jehovah’s unique right to pass judgment.
To speak abusively of another is to revile. Reviling is a sin.

(1 Corinthians 6:9, 10) . . .What! Do YOU not know that unrighteous persons will not inherit God’s kingdom? Do not be misled. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men, 10 nor thieves, nor greedy persons, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit God’s kingdom.


Even if one is being reviled, one has no right to revile in return. Jesus is the best example of this course of conduct.

(1 Peter 2:23) . . .When he was being reviled, he did not go reviling in return.. . .


This has not always been our way, as is exemplified by the case of Walter Salter. The Golden Age of May 5, 1937 on page 498 carries an article full of invective and quite unbecoming of Jehovah’s people. I found it difficult to read, as did another good friend who was unable to finish it.  It is so foreign to the spirit of Jehovah’s people now that is hard to imagine that it issued forth from the source we now claim was the first faithful and discreet slave appointed by Jesus in 1919.
I have posted the reference (hyperlink) in keeping with our forum directive of providing verifiable references to everything that we state.  However, I do not recommend that you read this article as it is too discouraging for our modern Christian sensibilities.  Instead, allow me to quote just a few excerpts so as to make the point of this post:

“If you are a “goat”, just go right ahead and make all the goat noises and goat odors that you wish.” (p. 500, par. 3)


“The man needs to be pruned.  He should submit himself to the specialists and let them excavate his gall bladder and remove his inordinate self-esteem.” (p. 502, par. 6)


“a man who…is not thinker, not Christian and no real man.” (p. 503, par. 9)


There are those who would rather cover up this unsavory aspect of our history. However, Bible writers do not do that and neither should we. This adage is as true as ever: “Those who will not learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.”
So what can we learn from our own history? Simply this: Besides being a sin before God, reviling demeans us and undermines any argument we might be trying to make.
In this forum we are delving into deep scriptural matters. In doing so we have uncovered a number of aspects of our doctrinal teaching as Jehovah’s Witnesses that are not in line with Scripture. We are also learning that a number of these discoveries which are new to us, have in fact been known for many decades to prominent members of Jehovah’s people—those in a position to affect change. The aforementioned case of Walter Salter is but one example of this, for he wrote back in 1937 to many in the faith about the unscriptural teaching of 1914 as the beginning of Christ’s presence.  Since this was revealed to God’s people some eighty years ago, why, we ask, does the false teaching continue to persist?  The apparent doctrinal intransigence of our leaders[i] may cause us to feel great frustration and even anger.  This may cause us to lash out at them verbally. There are many websites on the Internet where this is done on a regular basis.  However, in this forum we must not give in to this impulse.
We must let the truth speak for itself.
We must resist the temptation to pass judgment, especially with abusive terms.
We respect the opinion of our readers and members. Therefore, if you find that we have departed from the aforementioned standard of conduct in any of the forum posts, please feel free to comment so that we can correct these oversights.  We want to imitate the example of Michael the Archangel. We’re not suggesting that those who would lead us are comparable to the Devil. Rather, if even the Devil cannot be judged abusively, how much more so those are striving to feed us.
 
 
 
 





[i] I use the term "leaders" in speaking of how they would have us view them, not how we should view them. One is our leader, the Christ. (Mt. 23:10)  However, when someone demands the right to have you accept his teaching unquestioningly and backs that up with the hammer of discipline for those who dissent, it is hard to think of him as acting as anything but a leader, and an absolute one at that.


Archived Comments

We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.

  • Comment by Urbanus on 2013-04-01 00:18:33

    Period pieces are always interesting. I particularly enjoyed the box on the last page, under the heading "Does the GOLDEN AGE make you shiver?"
    In evaluating the work of the Society in this Stalinist/pre-WWII era, the recording "Enemies" denouncing the Papal/Axis power alliance speaks for itself. Who else or which other organization was so active at warning the world of this evil?
    Will the purges and tactics of this decade (1930's) return to WT Headquarters? Stayed turned. Perhaps we will hear it once again on WBBR.

    • Reply by apollos0falexandria on 2013-04-01 08:17:56

      Only a full reading of the documentation of the period will provide a balanced view of what was really going on.
      Rutherford's denunciation of the axis powers was primarily a vehicle for his attacks on the Catholic church. In my opinion these attacks actually became very political in nature.
      Let us not lose sight that that democracy under the allied forces were just as much an enemy of Christ's kingdom as the axis powers were. And yet there is no question that sides were taken in our publications of the period.
      However even before that happened Rutherford had tried to curry favour with Hitler through a letter sent in 1933 which included the following (translated from German):
      ................................
      ... there are no opposing views in the relationship between German Bible Students and the National Government of the German Reich, but that, to the contrary, respecting the purely religious and apolitical goals and objectives of the Bible Students, it can be said that these are in complete harmony with the similar goals of the National Government of the German Reich.
      ..................................
      Then in 1934 our Yearbook included the following highlights:
      .............................
      It is falsely charged by our enemies that we have received financial support for our work from the Jews. Nothing is farther from the truth. Up to this hour there never has been the slightest bit of money contributed to our work by Jews. We are the faithful followers of Christ Jesus and believe upon Him as the Savior of the world, whereas the Jews entirely reject Jesus Christ and emphatically deny that he is the Savior of the world sent of God for man's good ... It has been the commercial Jews of the British-American empire that have built up and carried on Big Business as a means of exploiting and oppressing the peoples of many nations. This fact particularly applies to the cities of London and New York, the stronghold of Big Business. This fact is so manifest in America that there is a proverb concerning the city of New York which says: 'The Jews own it, the Irish Catholics rule it, and the Americans pay the bills.' ...
      The present government of Germany has declared emphatically against Big Business oppressors and in opposition to the wrongful religious influence in the political affairs of the nations. Such is exactly our position ....
      Instead of being against the principles advocated by the government of Germany, we stand squarely for such principles, and point out that Jehovah God through Christ Jesus will bring about the full realization of these principles and will give to the people peace and prosperity and the greatest desire of every honest heart ... A careful examination of our books and literature will disclose the fact that the very high ideals held and promulgated by the present national government are set forth in and endorsed and strongly emphasized in our publications and show that Jehovah God will see to it that these high ideals in due time will be attained by all persons who love righteousness ... Let us remind the government and the people of Germany, that it was the League of Nations compact that laid upon the shoulders of the German people the great unjust and unbearable burdens. That the League of Nations compact was not brought forth by the friends of Germany.
      ...........................................
      In recent years we have made a defence of the convention referred to and the printed declaration. You can read more by looking up the article below in full:
      ............................................
      *** g98 7/8 p. 14 Jehovah’s Witnesses—Courageous in the Face of Nazi Peril ***
      This statement clearly did not refer to the Jewish people in general, and it is regrettable if it has been misunderstood and has given cause for any offense. Some have claimed that Jehovah’s Witnesses shared the hostility toward the Jews that was commonly taught in the German churches at the time. This is absolutely untrue. By their literature and conduct during the Nazi era, the Witnesses rejected anti-Semitic views and condemned the Nazi mistreatment of the Jews. Certainly, their kindness toward Jews who shared their lot in the concentration camps provides a resounding rebuttal to this false accusation.
      .............................................
      Nevertheless for someone to assert that a strong stand was taken against Hitler based upon opposing his ideals from the outset is clearly not representing the facts correctly. Rutherford undoubtedly went on the offensive against Hitler later when he realized that Hitler would not play ball. And at that point his reviling became so strong (including the use of those mocking cartoons against him and the Catholic church together) that this undoubtedly would have increased Hitler's own vitriol towards Jehovah's witnesses in Germany at the time.

      • Reply by Dorcas on 2013-04-01 17:39:43

        From the research I've done on this subject, you are absolutely correct. Our organization really must stop trying to rewrite history. I always enjoy your accurate and well-researched comments. You leave no stone unturned.

  • Comment by miken on 2013-04-01 07:06:45

    The attacks on Walter Salter and Olin Moyle were little as compared with the constant attacks with articles and cartoons on the Catholic Church often referred to as "The Hierarchy" (ironic relative to our own recent developments). They are too numerous to list here but one very strong example using a significant number of cartoons was the Golden Age issue, April 7, 1937. To quote "The Roman Catholic "religion" is merely a composite patchwork of all the heathen "religions", and no more represents true Christianity than a tub of dirty water represents the Atlantic ocean". See:-
    http://wtarchive.svhelden.info/english/the-golden-age/

  • Comment by JimmyG on 2013-04-04 06:47:19

    Your statement "it is so foreign to the spirit of Jehovah's people now" is intriguing. The authors of WT literature now are not as blunt as Rutherford was, but they still indulge in reviling those whom they consider 'apostate'.
    An example of this is the July 15, 2011 WT, page 16, where it says: "apostates are mentally diseased" (partially quoting the NWT version of 1 Tim 6:3,4). The surrounding paragraphs also contain a number of demeaning statements, including contracting some sort of spiritually infectious disease from 'apostates'.
    Many so called 'apostates' are JWs who have consulted the scriptures and discovered that many of the WT's doctrines are incorrect (as the contents of this website attest) and voiced their concerns over doctrinal error. The result? Expulsion, shunning and 'reviling' with labels such as 'mentally diseased' (among others),
    So is reviling 'so foreign to the spirit of Jehovah's people now'?.

    • Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2013-04-04 08:27:53

      You make an excellent point, JimmyG. A personal attack on an individual such as occurred with Walter Salter would be totally unacceptable to Jehovah's people nowadays, Even reviling a group of individuals is taboo. We don't make the kind of insulting attacks on the churches that we once did. But it appears we are not above reviling an amorphous groups of individuals. "Apostate" is a very handy label. Stamp it on the forehead of any one individual, and you no longer have to listen to him or deal with his arguments and reasoning. Anytime a troublesome individual cries out, "Yeah, but..." we can just whip out the old "Apostate!" label and slap it on him. All done.
      There are true apostates out there, to be sure. But we are throwing the baby out with the bathwater by the way we treat anyone who has an objection or even a concern with the way we are doing things or with something we may be teaching that doesn't have support in Scripture.
      An apostate is an antichrist, plain and simple. (1 John 2:18) He is one who opposes Jesus and his teachings. By putting the GB in the same category as Jesus, which we do overtly by demanding the faithful believe unquestioningly whatever is taught in the publications, and more subtly by removing Jesus from an illustration that depicts Jehovah over the GB (w13 04/15 p. 29) we are making it acceptable to treat anyone who questions the GB as if they were questioning and doubting our Lord Jesus Christ himself.
      No one wants to be labelled an apostate. No one wants to be cut off from one's family and friends. Yet we hunger for deep understanding of God's word. It is the food that feeds us and sustains us. So we must conduct our Bible study and Bible discussions using anonymous identities, or behind closed doors with trusted friends. This is what our religion has brought us to and it is a sorry state of affairs.
      1 Timothy 6:3,4 would certainly apply to a genuine apostate, an antichrist. Paul is contrasting the "healthful words...of our Lord Jesus Christ" with "questionings and debates about words" which exhibit a spiritually 'diseased mentality'. An apostate frequently exhibits such reasoning. However, we are talking about the "healthful words...of our Lord Jesus Christ", not the highly speculative teaching of a group of imperfect men.
      The Governing Body oversees the publication of all our literature. The great majority of what we print and publish is wonderful. It is well-thought out and healthful teaching. But it doesn't come from them. Let's give credit where credit is due. "Every good gift and every perfect present is from above..." (James 1:17) To take exception to the 'good gifts' and 'perfect presents' from Jehovah and his Son would be to oppose them, which is the "anti" in "antichrist". But when men introduce speculative interpretation which goes contrary to those good gifts and perfect presents, how can it be apostasy to oppose such unhealthful teaching?
      When men and women in centuries gone by stood up and opposed such teachings as the Trinity and Hellfire, they too were labelled as apostates. "Apostate" is not a handy-dandy little label that we can slap on anyone to shut them up. Can we imagine Jesus acting that way? Hardly!

      • Reply by PhantomOfTheKingdomHall on 2017-10-25 18:41:51

        ”So we must conduct our Bible study and Bible discussions using anonymous identities, or behind closed doors with trusted friends. This is what our religion has brought us to and it is a sorry state of affairs.”
        This is something I’ve also come to realize. I’m a physically healthy 31 year old but with a brain that keeps getting depressed. The atmosphere in ”the truth” lately doesnt help. But the comments of ppl on this site have truly helped me to get new strength from Gods Word. Heb 4:12
        Thanks

  • Comment by Qualifications to Become God’s Channel of Communication | Beroean Pickets on 2014-02-13 10:20:15

    […] against Rutherford from those inside the Bethel family such as Olin Moyle and Walter Salter (see Let Us Not Revile or Judge). These included accusations of reviling and misuse of alcohol. Of course it is acknowledged that […]

  • Comment by Bernabe on 2019-09-22 04:41:46

    I like this article. Both in content and in the way we express it, we must show our condition of Christians

Recent content

Hello, everyone. I've been wanting to do this for some time, to start a playlist, a series of videos dedicated just to understanding the Bible and leaving behind all the detritus of JW.org. I'll still have to do videos…

The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures gets a lot of flak. Many people accuse it of being a very biased translation. Now, there's two of them, of course. There's the 1984 version, and there's the 2013. The 2013…

Hello everyone. This is the second to last video in this series on shunning. Thank you for your patience as it has taken a while to get to this point. For those of you who haven’t seen the previous videos on shunning as…

Hello, everyone. I have something truly bizarre to share with you this time. It comes from a rather innocuous place, the July 2024 letter from the Governing Body to all the elders in North America and, I assume, around…

Statement by Brother Joss Goodall To My Brother and Sisters, I am writing to you to bring to your attention some very serious concerns that have been troubling me since August of last year when I listened to a morning worship video by Kenneth…

Jesus said that “the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father is seeking such as these to worship Him.” (John 4:23 BSB) Are you one of the people that God is seeking to worship Him? Maybe you’re thinking, “I…