James Penton speaks about the origins of the teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses

– posted by J_Penton
Witnesses are taught that Charles Taze Russell originated all the teachings that make Jehovah's Witnesses stand out from the other religions in Christendom. This turns out to be untrue. In fact, it will surprise most Witnesses to learn that their millenarian teachings come from a Catholic priest, a Jesuit no less. James Penton, a Canadian history professor and author of several scholarly books on Jehovah's Witnesses takes us back three centuries to the origin of many of the doctrines Witnesses mistakenly believe are theirs alone.

[embed]https://youtu.be/cuZMD4Uzn7M[/embed]

Archived Comments

We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.

  • Comment by Leonardo Josephus on 2019-12-28 12:09:46

    Hi Eric. Thanks so much for arranging this. All the background stuff is so helpful. Interesting to note the connection to the Plymouth Brethren, which I was totally unaware of.
    Thanks for the Aldbury Park link too.
    A lot about Russell was what I had concluded, namely that he hi-jacked ideas from others.
    Am I right that much of this information is in James Penton's book ?

    • Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2020-01-09 13:34:46

      That's correct. It's in Apocalypse Delayed

  • Comment by Chet on 2019-12-30 11:51:09

    Great information. What I find most interesting is that many religions are now finding their teachings scrutinized as the Internet makes information more readily available.

    It’s obvious that the Witnesses are not what they would claim to be. Their origins are not nearly so concise as they would have us believe. There’s nothing surprising about this. The 18th and 19th centuries were a time when many religious speculations were born and all sorts of new ideas came to light. I don’t think of this as bad, in and of itself, because people were resisting the hegemony of the religious establishment and paving the way for reform.

    The bad part is when people decide that these new movements should be followed without question. I can see no evidence that God is behind any of these movements. What is good, is that people are questioning and striving to see beyond the traditions of men.

Recent content

What is Armageddon?For Catholics, Protestants, and Orthodox Christians, Armageddon is symbolic—a metaphor for the struggle between good and evil, with good eventually prevailing in some undefined way at some unknown…

Did you know that Jesus Christ prophesied about what is now happening within the Organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses? Seriously!Here it is:“Many false prophets will arise and mislead many; and because of the…

“Regrets? I have a few. But then again, too few to mention.” I was tempted to sing those lyrics from the 1969 song My Way, but I’m no Frank Sinatra.The reason I refer to those lyrics is because, by contrast, I have many…

 The Governing Body just reversed a policy that they’ve enforced since I was a teenager.  It’s their prohibition on Higher Education.Is it appropriate for Christians to pursue additional education? With this…

Hello everyone,We now come to the most controversial part of Revelation chapter 20, the final vision. Those who believe the entire chapter presents a single timeline, a single chronological vision, conclude that what is…

Hello everyone.In our last video, we tackled what is likely a spurious statement in Revelation 20:5. While I don’t consider it part of the vision John received, I do believe it reflects an accurate understanding of the…