The Long Con: How Watch Tower Altered the 1950 New World Translation to Support False Doctrine

– posted by meleti

In our last video, we saw overwhelming scriptural evidence proving that loyal, god-fearing men and women who lived before Christ have gained the reward of entry into the Kingdom of God by means of their faith. We also saw how the Organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses either ignores this evidence or creates silly workarounds to try to explain it away. If you haven’t seen that video, here’s a link to it and I’ll also include another link at the end of this video.

What “evidence” does the Governing Body put forward to support their doctrine that all those pre-Christian faithful ones do not inherit the Kingdom, but only get a provisional salvation on earth, still laboring under the weight of sin for a thousand years after all they have endured in faith?

Matthew 11:11. “And what other evidence to they provide?” you ask. No, that’s it! Just the one scripture. It reads:

“Truly I say to you, among those born of women, there has not been raised up anyone greater than John the Baptist, but a lesser person in the Kingdom of the heavens is greater than he is.” (Matthew 11:11 NWT)

To many Witnesses, that seems to be conclusive proof of the Organization’s position. But they are missing something. I have already dealt with this topic extensively in my book, Shutting the Door to the Kingdom of God: How Watch Tower Stole Salvation from Jehovah’s Witnesses, and am happy to share that research here.

You will notice that the Organization’s reasoning is based on a single verse taken out of context. That is a red flag for those of us on the lookout for cherry-picked verses.  But this goes beyond simply cherry-picking a verse as we’ll see soon.

Before we move forward, a word about Matthew’s unique use of the phrase “the Kingdom of the Heavens.” This wording only occurs in Matthew’s gospel. Other writers of the Christian Scriptures use the phrase, “the Kingdom of God.” No one knows why Matthew is different, but one theory is that he was writing for an audience that was sensitive to making any reference to God, so he used a euphemism to avoid putting his audience off. For us today, we must not think that he is referring to a place. He is not saying “the Kingdom in Heaven,” but “of the Heavens,” thus referring not to the location of that Kingdom, but the source of its authority. This is important because due to religious indoctrination, many Christians get hung up on location, which is not the issue.

Now let’s read the context of Matthew 11:11 in the New World Translation.

“While these were on their way, Jesus began to speak to the crowds about John: “What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed being tossed by the wind? 8 What, then, did you go out to see? A man dressed in soft garments? Why, those wearing soft garments are in the houses of kings. 9 Really, then, why did you go out? To see a prophet? Yes, I tell you, and far more than a prophet. 10 This is the one about whom it is written: ‘Look! I am sending my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way ahead of you!’ 11 Truly I say to you, among those born of women, there has not been raised up anyone greater than John the Baptist, but a lesser person in the Kingdom of the heavens is greater than he is. 12 From the days of John the Baptist until now, the Kingdom of the heavens is the goal toward which men press, and those pressing forward are seizing it. 13 For all, the Prophets and the Law, prophesied until John; 14 and if you are willing to accept it, he is ‘E·liʹjah who is to come.’ 15 Let the one who has ears listen.” (Matthew 11:7-15 NWT)

In what way is a lesser person in the Kingdom of the heavens greater than John the Baptist? The Organization would have you believe it is speaking about the salvation hope that each has. The least in the Kingdom of the heavens will inherit the Kingdom whereas John the Baptist being less than that will not inherit the Kingdom. But that ignores the context. The context isn't speaking about the salvation hope of each one but rather of the role that each one plays. But we'll come back to that in a moment. I believe that the lengths to which the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses has gone to support their point of view undermines their entire argument causing them to lose all credibility for this particular teaching. To explain what I mean, I'm going to read verse 12 again from the 1950 New World Translation.

“From the days of John the Baptist until now the Kingdom of the heavens is the goal toward which men press, and those pressing forward are seizing it.” (Matthew 11:12 NWT 1950)

As you can see, there has been no change in their wording of this verse in the last 70 years. When you read this, you are given to understand that people have been pressing toward or striving to get into the Kingdom of God from the time of John the Baptist onward. This leads the reader to conclude that the way into that Kingdom was not open to those who died before John the Baptist. How nicely this supports the doctrine promoted by the Organization. Now I want you to read what verse 12 really says. We’ll start with a short selection of translations taken from, but if you care to check, you’ll find that these renderings are consistent with all the dozens of other versions available there.

From the days of John the Baptist until now, the Kingdom of heaven has been subjected to violence, and violent people have been raiding it. (Matthew 11:12 New International Version)

…the Kingdom of heaven has suffered violent attacks, and violent men try to seize it. (Good News Translation)

…the kingdom of heaven has suffered violence, and the violent take it by force. (English Standard Version)

…the kingdom of heaven has been subject to violence, and the violent lay claim to it. (Berean Standard Bible)

This is very much the opposite of what the NWT would have you believe. Jesus is talking about men attacking the Kingdom of God and seizing it. You might think such a thing to be impossible. How can a mere human seize God’s Kingdom?  Yet, we cannot deny Jesus’ words.  The answer lies in the time frame that Jesus lays down: From the days of John the Baptist until now! That is, until the moment when Jesus uttered his words. What was he referring to?

He tells us by means of one of his prophetic parables. Reading from Matthew 21:33-43 in the NIV:

“Listen to another parable: There was a landowner who planted a vineyard. He put a wall around it, dug a winepress in it and built a watchtower. Then he rented the vineyard to some farmers and moved to another place. When the harvest time approached, he sent his servants to the tenants to collect his fruit. “The tenants seized his servants; they beat one, killed another, and stoned a third. Then he sent other servants to them, more than the first time, and the tenants treated them the same way.”

The owner of the vineyard is Jehovah God.  Here, Jesus is referring to the way the prophets of old were treated by the Jewish leaders.

Last of all, he sent his son to them. ‘They will respect my son,’ he said. “But when the tenants saw the son, they said to each other, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him and take his inheritance.’ So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.

Obviously, the Son refers to Jesus himself. What is his inheritance? Is it not the Kingdom of God? The wicked men think that by killing Jesus, they can get the inheritance for themselves. Foolish men.

“Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?”

“He will bring those wretches to a wretched end,” they replied, “and he will rent the vineyard to other tenants, who will give him his share of the crop at harvest time.” Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: “ ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; the Lord has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes’?

“Therefore I tell you that the Kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit.” (Matthew 21:33-43 NIV)

Now we can see how Matthew 11:12 makes sense. From the time of John onward, the Jewish religious leaders had acted violently toward the Kingdom, opposing it at every turn and finally trying to seize it violently by killing the son of God. The salvation hope that the Kingdom of God represents had not come to its fulfillment at that point. Indeed, we are still waiting for that salvation. However, as Jesus himself said, the Kingdom of God was in their midst.

“Once, on being asked by the Pharisees when the Kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The coming of the Kingdom of God is not something that can be observed, nor will people say, ‘Here it is,’ or ‘There it is,’ because the Kingdom of God is in your midst.”” (Luke 17:20, 21 NIV)

To summarize, the Kingdom of God was in the midst of the Jewish people, because Jesus was there among them. From the time John made his entrance to announce the Messiah, until that moment when Jesus spoke those prophetic words, the Kingdom of God (represented by Jesus) had suffered violent attacks and violent men were still trying to seize it.  

This wicked subversion of Matthew 11:12 began with Fred Franz and Nathan Knorr who were charged with supporting the ridiculous doctrines of J.F. Rutherford. Fred Franz was the principal translator of the New World Translation and from its beginning, in 1950, he changed the meaning of this verse to support the false teaching of the Governing Body that no pre-Christian servant of God had the Kingdom hope.

Since the beginning of time, men and women of faith have been striving toward the Kingdom of God, not just since the time of John the Baptist as Fred Franz would have us believe by his bad translation. For instance,

“By faith Abraham…lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise. For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God.” (Hebrews 11:8-10 BSB)

That city would be the New Jerusalem, the capital of the Kingdom of God. (Revelation 21:2)

Speaking of other men and women of faith, the writer of Hebrews adds:

“…they were longing for a better country, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for He has prepared a city for them.” (Hebrews 11:16 BSB)

That symbolic “heavenly country” is the Kingdom of God with New Jerusalem as its capital.

“[Moses] valued disgrace for Christ above the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking ahead to his reward.” (Hebrews 11:26 BSB)

So, if Jesus isn’t referring to the salvation hope held out to John and those dying before him in faith, then what is he referring to? Let’s look at the context.

Jesus ends his counsel regarding John by exhorting his audience to listen, to pay attention, and to discern the significance of what he has said, because it affects them. He opens in the first three verses by asking them what they went out into the wilderness to find. They saw John as a prophet, but now Jesus tells them he is much more than a prophet. He is God’s messenger. So it is within that context that his next words must be taken. When he says that “there has not been raised up another greater than John the Baptist,” he is putting John above all other prophets, including the greatest of them, Moses! That must have been a stunning declaration for his Jewish listeners to hear.

How could John be greater than Moses who was used to lead the people to freedom out of Egypt by bringing forth the ten plagues and splitting the Red Sea by the power of God working through him? The answer is because something greater than Moses and all the prophets had arrived! The Son of God had come, and John was the messenger of the covenant preparing the way for him. (Malachi 3:1) John introduced the King of the Kingdom of God.

So it is within that context that we must view Jesus’ words that “a lesser person in the Kingdom of the heavens is greater than” John. Nothing in the context speaks to John’s salvation hope, but rather his role as both the prophet and the messenger of the covenant announcing the Messianic King.

John himself refers to his role not his salvation hope! The next day he beheld Jesus coming toward him, and John said: “See, the Lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world! This is the one about whom I said, Behind me there comes a man who has advanced in front of me, because he existed before me. Even I did not know him, but the reason why I came baptizing in water was that he might be made manifest to Israel.” (John 1:29-31)

How is it then that this great prophet, John the Baptist, is less than the least one of those in the Kingdom of the heavens? Consider his own words for our answer:

“Whoever has the bride is the bridegroom. But the friend of the bridegroom, when he stands and hears him, has a great deal of joy on account of the voice of the bridegroom. So my joy has been made complete. That one must keep on increasing, but I must keep on decreasing.” (John 3:29, 30)

Remember, within the context of Jesus’ words at Matthew 11:7-15, we are not speaking of salvation, but of the work each one does. John prophesied, which in Greek means to speak forth God’s words.  But he did not preach the Kingdom. Jesus preached the Kingdom, and his followers after him. John preached the King. He introduced the King and then he decreased while Jesus increased. 

Jesus did greater works than John.

But I have the witness greater than that of John, for the very works that my Father assigned me to accomplish, the works themselves that I am doing, bear witness about me that the Father dispatched me.” (John 5:36)

But Jesus’ followers would do greater works even than Jesus. Yes, as astonishing as that sounds, we cannot doubt it, because it comes right from the mouth of our Lord:

“Most truly I say to YOU, He that exercises faith in me, that one also will do the works that I do; and he will do works greater than these, because I am going my way to the Father.” (John 14:12)

Before we can complete our analysis, we need to do a tiny bit of deprogramming.  You see, in our culture, a prophet foretells the future, but in Greek, that wasn’t the essential meaning of “prophet.” The word for prophet in Greek is prophétés which has a much broader meaning than it does in English.

According to HELPS Word-studies

A prophet (4396 /prophḗtēs) declares the mind (message) of God, which sometimes predicts the future (foretelling) – and more commonly, speaks forth His message for a particular situation.

Thus, when Christians speak forth the word of God, they are acting as prophets in the biblical sense.

So, the chain of logic is evident:

John the Baptist was greater than the prophets before him because his role as a prophet and the messenger of the covenant surpassed theirs. He announced the King of God’s Kingdom. They didn’t. 

But that King, Jesus, did works greater than John because he preached the Kingdom of God. Jesus’ disciples also preached the Kingdom of God and surpassed Jesus, according to his own words. Therefore, the lesser one in the Kingdom of the heavens is greater than John because we act as “prophets” greater than he was because we preach the good news of the Kingdom.

As we showed in the previous video, the insane and wholly unscriptural theology of the Governing Body that denies faithful pre-Christian men and women their just reward came about as a means to support the doctrine of the other sheep. To this end, Fred Franz, as the principal translator of the 1950 edition of the New World Translation, wilfully mistranslated Matthew 11:12 (among many other verses).

What does Jehovah have to say about those who change the meaning of his word?

I testify to everyone who hears the words of prophecy in this book: If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes away from the words of this book of prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and the holy city, which are described in this book. (Revelation 22:18, 19 BSB)

While those words are specifically written with regard to the Revelation given to John, I don’t think it would be safe to say that God doesn’t feel the same about all his inspired words, would you?

Personally, when I learned how the New World Translation had been altered from its inception, almost from the year of my birth, I was deeply offended and incensed at the wickedness that would move men to do such a thing and intentionally deceive so many. To me, this is proof that the spirit of Satan has been at work for a long time laboring behind the scenes as an angel of light to subvert the faith of millions of Jehovah’s Witnesses and keep many from reaching out to the real prize of the Kingdom of God. After all, if men like Moses, Elijah, Daniel, and John the Baptist, aren’t good enough to make the kingdom according to Jehovah’s Witnesses, what hope does the average Jehovah’s Witnesses have?

Thank you for your attention. I appreciate the support you give me and the team that helps me produce these videos.

Archived Comments

We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.

  • Comment by James Mansoor on 2022-12-23 16:15:53

    Good morning everyone,

    In my bible reading this morning, I came across this scripture in 2Corinthians 13:1 This is the third time I am coming to you. “On the testimony of two or three witnesses every matter must be established.”

    In looking at, commentators are divided as to the true meaning of the apostle Paul.

    I was raised up in believing in the rule, if in doubt, leave it out.

    Have a great morning everyone

  • Comment by Leonardo Josephus on 2022-12-20 18:23:10

    I honestly cannot tell you how incensed I was to read this article. Talk about deliberate deception ! I have a list of many scriptures that are poorly translated, some absolutely on purpose.
    However the translation of the verses in Matthew 11 takes the biscuit (does that go into other languages ? ). It is l proof of intentional misrepresentation, with no other point other than to support a shaky doctrine.
    It is worse than "in union with" which not in the Greek and is inserted into a number of verses to help identify the anointed. It is worse than the occasions where Jehovah's name appears when the Greek "Kyrios" almost certainly refers to Christ Jesus. It is worse than the incorrect older interpretation of Leviticus 5:1, which was used to support turning in a sinner. I am sure some of you here will know a few more.
    The change to Matthew 11 misleads, and it certainly misled me. It makes me ask "what were those men thinking when they translated these verses in the way that they did? Did they really think they could get away with it ? Did they think Jehovah would not notice ? If put under trial could they possibly plead "not guilty" and be found innocent ? One will judge, and I am glad it is not me. May justice be done.

  • Comment by Condoriano on 2022-12-20 19:40:47

    Another fake scripture in the NWT...

    Worse yet, I looked it up in the current study bible and here is the study note for that verse.

    the goal toward which men press . . . those pressing forward: Two related Greek words used here convey the basic idea of forceful action or endeavor. Some Bible translators have understood them in a negative sense (that of acting with or suffering violence), but the context and the only other Biblical occurrence of the Greek verb, at Lu 16:16, make it reasonable to understand the terms in the positive sense of “going after something with enthusiasm; seeking fervently.” These words evidently describe the forceful actions or endeavors of those who responded to the preaching of John the Baptist, which put them in line to become prospective members of the Kingdom.

    I feel like this is deceptive as it seems like it implies Luke 16:16 justifies this interpretation. If you didn't read the verse, you might just assume that it's a verse where the term is obviously used in a positive sense. But if you actually read the verse... it's just saying the same as Matt. And what of the study note there?

    pressing forward: The Greek word used here conveys the basic idea of forceful action or endeavor. Some Bible translators have understood this in a negative sense (that of acting with or suffering violence), but the context, the Kingdom of God is being declared as good news, makes it reasonable to understand the term in the positive sense of “going after something with enthusiasm; seeking fervently.” These words evidently describe the forceful actions or endeavors of those who responded to the preaching of the good news about God’s Kingdom, which put them in line to become prospective members of that Kingdom.

    Nothing really convincing there, is it? It even says "but the context" and... well, reading verse 17:

    Indeed, it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled. (NWT)

    Doesn't that context support more the idea of, "Men try to violent seize it (the Kingdom of God), but it's foolish because the scriptures will absolutely be fulfilled."

    I also notice that most translations have verse 17 as starting with "But" vs "Indeed" which is also misleading, in my opinion.

    • Reply by Leonardo Josephus on 2022-12-21 04:36:31

      Thanks for raising Luke 16:16. That verse can be hard to translate accurately if read on its own. But to whom was Jesus speaking ? Verse 16, spoken to the Pharisees, reads "You are those who declare themselves righteous before men, but God knows your hearts; because what is lofty among men is a disgusting thing in God's sight".
      Verse 16 does not appear to be a general statement, but rather it seems to be directed to those Pharisees, who would stop at nothing to get their way and get into the Kingdom, although , of course they would not be successful unless they recognised the way in.
      Subsequent verses also are directed to the Pharisees, so I can see no reason to take verse 16 out of context.
      Mind you, that is only my view.

      • Reply by Condoriano on 2022-12-21 14:34:16

        From what I understand, it looks like Jesus was teaching the crowds. Then the Pharisees, who were money lovers, were sneering at Jesus. Then Jesus, knowing their hearts, directed verses 14 and 15 at them but then continued speaking/teaching everyone (which included the Pharisees listening) at verse 16 and beyond.

        I'm not an expert by any means. That's just how I understood it as I read it.

  • Comment by jwc on 2022-12-21 00:57:15

    Thank you Eric,

    I’ve watched it once & realise I need to watch it again & read the script. btw - thank you for giving us a copy of the script; it says a lot about your motivation to help us understand the Truth by thus sharing.

    John The Baptist was for me an extraordinary person. The meaning of a “humble servant” as John embodied, is a lesson for all of us to keep in mind. He sought no “self-glory” for himself and I have absolutely no doubt that his place in God’s Kingdom (whatever that maybe) is guaranteed!

    More to follow …

  • Comment by James Mansoor on 2022-12-21 17:59:53

    Norway government has revoked the status of NGO of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

    No more tax exemptions.

    Anthony Morris was claiming, the reason why is because of this stand against Disfellowshipping.

    The governing body is very clever in telling you half truth as you do your own research. The governing body goes beyond and above revoking someone’s membership.

    They basically destroy someone’s social life, and even family members are encouraged, not to be speaking to a disfellowshipped person.

    I don’t know if somebody has picked that one up?

    This was an update from the governing body.

    Firstly they adulterate the word of God, then they want to destroy someone’s reputation and social life, and isolate all JW’s family members, socially.

    One elder said to me, Satan is after us financially, hardly physically anymore.

    And Jesus said: “ And you will be hated “financially” by all people on account of my name” Matthew 10:22

    Since the governing body wants to adulterate the word of God, why not insert “financially” as well?

    Keep exposing Eric and may our Heavenly Father and his son Jesus Christ be with the spirit you show.

    • Reply by Condoriano on 2022-12-21 18:55:08

      I also noticed how Morris asked all JWs to please make this issue with Sweden a matter of prayer. I really wonder if he sincerely wants and believes that prayers will help the WT or if he just knows it's a good way to keep members aware and "involved".

      • Reply by Ad_Lang on 2022-12-21 20:40:57

        They do it to establish a persecution complex, due to a perceived common enemy. Jesus also said in Mat 10:17-18 that they (his disciples) would be taken to courts and people would scourge them in their synagogues. Note that governors and kings also have a judicial role. Also, I remember seeing "tribunal" being used instead of "court". Now isn't a Judicial Committee exactly a tribunal?

        I found it most peculiar that, from Acts 4 down through history until today, Christians have been persecuted most, not by all non-Christians, but by their own brothers. How many people did the Sanhedrin (Jewish tribunal) cause to be killed? Weren't the Jews on the forefront of stirring up the Romans, who otherwise couldn't care less, against Christians?

        Didn't the Catholic church convene tribunals to do away with heretics and even others who didn't fit in (eg had too much knowledge)? How often didn't that church (ab)use a secular authority to have its way, or to further establish or strengthen their own base of members?

        What about other denominations, and religions?

        • Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2022-12-22 09:25:45

          I learned a lot about "projection" the last few years following the news about President Trump who liked to project his sins on others. "Fake News" was on term which became a prime example of projection. But all liars do this. This week's midweek meeting talks about protecting yourself (addressing witnesses) from persecution. I lived as a Witness for 60 years, and never experienced persecution until the day I stood up for truth and found that those who I had called friends turned on me, just as Jesus said they would, and persecuted me. The irony is that they think I'm the one persecuting them.

          • Reply by Condoriano on 2022-12-22 15:49:27

            On the subject of "fake news", here we are at the end of 2022 and the WT has finally just released a video titled "Protect Yourself From Misinformation". Spiritual food at the later time, right?
            Funny enough... the video quotes Job 12:11 and says that "when you taste something new, you can spit it out if it's bad before your swallow it." This is actually huge because it would mean that a JW can "test" anything said by an "apostate" instead of just outright rejecting it. I doubt the average JW will make this connection though... Worse yet, the video introduced the concept of "deep fakes." I've already seen someone make the claim that the ARC videos of Jackson must be fakes because they can do that now.

            Coincidentally, the video never suggests the possibility that the information you've received is actually true... except for once. "If you hear something that makes you anxious or suspicious, going to someone you trust, someone with more experience, can help you evaluate the truth behind it." Basically... elders and the WT as whole get a free pass... even though they shouldn't (Gal. 1:8,9)

    • Reply by Leonardo Josephus on 2022-12-22 04:31:15

      Hi James
      Easy to spot a half truth, isn't it ?
      "The Ministry of Children and Families (in Norway) concluded that the JWs exclusion practice towards children under 18 and the corresponding consequences for children who opt out of the religious community violates children's rights".
      That is what I read on the CNE blog.
      To say Norway have taken a stand against Disfellowshipping is very it makes it sound like some sort of religious thing.
      You can read the rest for yourself, of course.

      • Reply by James Mansoor on 2022-12-22 15:34:55

        Good morning Leonardo,

        Many thanks for the info, I got the article that you are talking about:

        Norwegian Jehovah's Witnesses will not get their grant from 2021. The Ministry of Children and Families decided so after the community appealed the ruling of the State Administrator in March this year.
        "The Ministry of Children and Families concluded that the Jehovah's Witnesses' exclusion practice towards children under 18 and corresponding consequences for children who opt out of the religious community violates children's rights." That is what the Ministry wrote in an e-mail to Vart Land. The decision is now final and cannot be appealed.
        In January, the State Administrator of Norway denied the community of Jehovah's Witnesses subsidies for 2021, which amounted to 16 million NOK (approximately 1.5 million euros). The reason for this grant withdrawal was the community's exclusionary practices, Dagen writes.
        When a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses decides to step out or loses his or her faith, the Jehovah's Witnesses socially exclude him or her. Members are forbidden to have contact with the person concerned. The State Administrator argued that this practice violates the Religious Society Act, as earlier reported by The State also feared that children are at risk of social isolation. The fact that unbaptised children are exposed to social isolation can be seen as negative social control, the State Administrator wrote in January, according to Vart Land.
        The Jehovah's Witnesses appealed this ruling in March, claiming that other courts worldwide have regularly ruled that the exclusionary practice is a legal, religious procedure that "is protected by the freedom of religion and freedom of assembly."
        The religious community is disappointed by the decision of the Ministry of Children and Families. They told Dagen they would review the decision and decide what to do next.

        This is useful for ALL PIMO’s and others as well… Knowledge is power.

        Thanks again

      • Reply by James Mansoor on 2022-12-22 16:03:13

        Thanks Leonardo,

        I have copied and pasted the courts ruling on this matter. It’s awaiting approval.

  • Comment by Ad_Lang on 2022-12-21 21:01:57

    Out of all the things I didn't do, I am glad that I did have the wisdom and courage to perceive and openly proclaim that the governing body is our modern-day Korah. Well, actually they are only part of our modern-day Korah, also known as "Babylon the Great" (Rev 17,18).

    I share your feeling of offense and incense at the wickedness of men. You find it in religion, governments, education and any other place where power is to be had. Fortunately, there is a large group of both Christians and non-Christians who, although utterly misled (thus not finding the narrow gate to the narrow path that leads to life), see the wickedness and abhor it just as we do. I find verses like Rev 20:6, 21:24-27 and 22:11 greatly comforting with the thought that Christians are taken out now, but the whole of mankind will experience the benefits of Jesus' rule.

    This would in particular affect the non-Christian friends I have, who have turned their back on Jehovah and Jesus, largely because of all the deceit and wickedness people have committed in their name. People claiming to act for God and Jesus have been among the worst causes of suffering in history and that hasn't changed. Not surprising that people generally don't want to know about Jesus or God's Kingdom at all.

  • Comment by Fani on 2022-12-22 11:32:52

    Notre condition d'humain, si grande soit elle comme celle de Jean Baptiste, est forcément plus faible et moindre que notre condition dans le Royaume de Dieu.
    Pour moi, dans Mathieu 11 : 11 "Je vous le dis en vérité, parmi ceux qui sont nés de femmes, il n'est venu personne de plus grand que Jean-Baptiste. Cependant, le plus petit dans le royaume des cieux est plus grand que lui." (Matthieu 11.11)
    (Bible d'étude Segond 21) souligne l'opposition entre la condition humaine sous la condamnation du péché par rapport au "plus petit dans le royaume du Christ" libéré de la loi du péché et de la mort, qui a gagné la vie puisqu'il est dans le royaume de Dieu.

    Cela ne voulait pas dire que Jean Baptiste n'aurait pas sa place dans le Royaume de Dieu. Cela n'a rien à voir. Le verset ne parle pas de différence de salut mais de différence de position. Jean Baptiste est encore sur la terre et "le plus petit" est déjà dans le Royaume.
    Lorsqu'on hérite du royaume, on hérite aussi de la vie éternelle ce que n'avait pas encore reçu d'une façon effective Jean Baptiste.
    Tant que nous n'avons pas terminé notre course sur la terre, nous ne pouvons pas dire que nous avons gagné la vie.
    Paul dit
    "Ce n'est pas que j'aie déjà remporté le prix ou que j'aie déjà atteint la perfection, mais je cours pour tâcher de m'en emparer, puisque de moi aussi, Jésus-Christ s'est emparé.
    Frères et sœurs, je n'estime pas m'en être moi-même déjà emparé, mais je fais une chose: oubliant ce qui est derrière et me portant vers ce qui est devant
    je cours vers le but pour remporter le prix de l'appel céleste de Dieu en Jésus-Christ". (Philippiens 3.12/14)
    (Bible d'étude Segond 21).

    Notre position est donc inférieure à celui qui EST EFFECTIVEMENT dans le royaume de Dieu qui lui, a la vie éternelle.
    Quoiqu'il en soit il est évident, selon les paroles de Paul en hébreux, qu'au même titre qu'Abraham, Jean Baptiste sera dans le Royaume de Dieu.
    Nous sommes tous dans l'attente d'y rentrer.
    C'est ce que je comprends.

    Je n'avais pas pensé au sens de s'emparer du royaume d'une façon injuste comme l'ont fait les pharisiens. La parabole de Mathieu 21 : 33-39 l'explique très bien.
    C'est logique et enfin clair.

    Merci beaucoup.

  • Comment by James Mansoor on 2022-12-29 19:51:31

    Good morning, everyone,

    1 Peter 5:4 And when the chief shepherd has been made manifest, you will receive the unfading crown of glory. : The word manifest according to Strong Greek: 5319 To make clear (visible, manifest), make known. From phaneros; to render apparent.

    How on Gods earth can GB teach resurrection of Christ brothers took place in 1919 when everyone will see Jesus Christ?

  • Comment by thegabry on 2023-01-04 18:21:48

    La Questione che non mi pare Sia ancora Stata capita è che Non esiste a tutt'oggi , una Religione Approvata da Dio o VERA, tutte le Religioni sono figlie della Grande Prostituta.
    Nella Parabola del Grano e Delle zizzanie, Gesù indica chiaramente che il Grano e Le zizzanie crescono Insieme fino alla MIETITURA, alla MIETITURA il Grano viene posto nel Granaio " dove c'è SOLO GRANO" e Le zizzanie vengono Bruciate.
    Di conseguenza non esiste oggi sulla Terra una Religione o movimento religioso che abbia al suo Interno " solo veri Cristiani" o Grano.
    E le Zizzanie cioè i falsi Cristiani sono presenti in tutte le organizzazioni religiose!
    Nella Bibbia non c'è nessuna scrittura che indichi che prima dell'inizio della "PRESENZA" ci sia una VERA ADORAZIONE ORGANIZZATA.
    Secondo Giovanni ,nella Rivelazione, Egli si ritrova nel Giorno del Signore cioè durante la SUA presenza, e SOLO allora viene detto che "Agli Eletti" o i 144.000 VIENE POSTO IL SIGILLO.
    Quindi i 144.000 vengono scelti Solo Durante la Presenza ,non prima , infatti Gesù in Marco 13: 26 E allora vedranno il Figlio dell’uomo venire nelle nubi con grande potenza e gloria. 27 Lui manderà quindi gli angeli e radunerà i suoi eletti dai quattro venti, dall’estremità della terra fino all’estremità del cielo.
    Gli Eletti Sarebbero Stati Radunati Dopo l'inizio del suo Regno!

Recent content

Hello everyone. This is the second to last video in this series on shunning. Thank you for your patience as it has taken a while to get to this point. For those of you who haven’t seen the previous videos on shunning as…

Hello, everyone. I have something truly bizarre to share with you this time. It comes from a rather innocuous place, the July 2024 letter from the Governing Body to all the elders in North America and, I assume, around…

Statement by Brother Joss Goodall To My Brother and Sisters, I am writing to you to bring to your attention some very serious concerns that have been troubling me since August of last year when I listened to a morning worship video by Kenneth…

Jesus said that “the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father is seeking such as these to worship Him.” (John 4:23 BSB) Are you one of the people that God is seeking to worship Him? Maybe you’re thinking, “I…

In this video we will continue our analysis of the gaslighting methods used by the Governing Body to induce a hypnotic grip on the hearts and minds of Jehovah’s Witnesses. This time we’ll be covering a talk delivered by Gage Fleegle on called…

[This contributed letter does not necessarily reflect all the views of our community. We post it here as a service to those who seek to worship God "in spirit and in truth" (John 4:20-24)] AN OPEN LETTER TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES…