Does our salvation as Christians depend on keeping the Sabbath? Men like Mark Martin, a former Jehovah’s Witness, preach that Christians must observe a weekly Sabbath day in order to be saved. As he defines it, keeping the Sabbath means setting aside the 24-hour time period between 6 pm on Friday to 6 pm on Saturday to cease work and worship God. He adamantly claims that keeping a Sabbath (according to the Jewish calendar) is what separates true Christians from false Christians. In his Hope Prophecy video called “Intending to Change Times and Law” he says this:
"You see the people who worship the one true God came together on the Sabbath day. If you worship the one true God this was the day that he picked. It identifies his people and separates them from the rest of the world. And Christians that know this and believe in the Sabbath day, it separates them from much of Christianity."
Mark Martin isn’t the only one to preach that the commandment to keep the Sabbath is a requirement for Christians. The 21 million baptized members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church are also required to keep the Sabbath. In fact, it is so critical to their theological structure of worship, that they’ve branded themselves with the name “Seventh-day Adventists,” which literally means “Sabbath Adventists.”
If indeed it is true that we have to keep the Sabbath to be saved, then it would seem that Jesus’ had it wrong when he said that love would be the identifier for true Christians. Perhaps John 13:35 should read, “by this all will know that you are my disciples—if you keep the Sabbath.” “By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.”
My father was raised as a Presbyterian, but he converted to become one of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the early 1950s. My aunt and grandmother, however, chose to become Seventh-day Adventists. After doing this research into the Seventh-day Adventist church, I have seen some disquieting similarities between the two religions.
I don't believe we should keep a weekly Sabbath in the manner that Mark Martin and the SDA church preach. It is not a salvation requirement based on my research. I think you’ll see in this two-part video series that the Bible does not support the teaching of the Seventh-day Adventists on this issue.
Sure, Jesus kept the Sabbath because he was a Jew living at the time when the law code was still in force. But that only applied to Jews under the law. Romans, Greeks, and all other gentiles were not under the Sabbath, so if that Jewish law was going to continue in force after Jesus fulfilled the law as prophesied that he would, one would expect some clear direction from our Lord on the matter, yet there is nothing from him nor any other Christian writer telling us to keep the Sabbath. So where does that teaching come from? Could it be that the source of the reasoning that is leading millions of Adventists to keep the Sabbath is the same source that has led millions of Jehovah’s Witnesses to refuse to partake of the bread and wine emblematic of Jesus’ life-saving flesh and blood. Why do men get carried away with their own intellectual reasoning instead of just accepting what it clearly stated in Scripture?
What is the intellectual reasoning that leads these pastors and ministers to promote Sabbath keeping? It starts out this way:
The 10 commandments that Moses brought down from the mountain on two stone tablets represent a timeless moral law code. For example, the 6th commandment tells us we must not murder, the 7th, that we must not commit adultery, the 8th, we must not steal, the 9th, we must not lie… are any of these commandments obsolete now? Of course not! So why would we consider the 4th, the law about keeping the Sabbath day of rest, to be obsolete? Since we wouldn’t break the other commandments—murdering, stealing, lying—then why break the commandment on keeping the Sabbath?
The problem with relying on human ideas and intellect is that we rarely see all the variables. We don’t perceive all the factors affecting a matter, and because of pride, we forge ahead following our own inclinations instead of allowing ourselves to be guided by the holy spirit. As Paul told the Corinthian Christians who were getting ahead of themselves:
“The scripture says, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise and set aside the understanding of the scholars.” So then, where does that leave the wise? or the scholars? or the skillful debaters of this world? God has shown that this world's wisdom is foolishness!” (1 Corinthians 1:19, 20 Good News Bible)
My brothers and sisters, we must never say, “I believe this or that, because this man says, or that man says.” We are all mere mortals, often wrong. Now, more than ever before, there is a superabundance of information at our fingertips, but it all originates from the mind of some human. We must learn to reason for ourselves and to stop thinking that just because something appears in writing or on the internet it must be true, or simply because we like someone who sounds down to earth and reasonable, then what they say must be true.
Paul also reminds us not to “copy the behavior and customs of this world, but let God transform you into a new person by changing the way you think. Then you will learn to know God’s will for you, which is good and pleasing and perfect.” (Romans 12:2 NLT)
So the question remains, should we keep the Sabbath? We have learned to study the Bible exegetically, which means we allow the Bible to reveal the meaning of the Bible writer rather than start with a preconceived idea about what the original writer meant. Therefore, we won’t assume we know what the Sabbath is nor how to keep it. Instead, we’ll let the Bible tell us. It says in the Book of Exodus:
“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. For six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of the LORD your God; on it you shall not do any work, you, or your son, or your daughter, your male slave or your female slave, or your cattle, or your resident who stays with you. For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea and everything that is in them, and He rested on the seventh day; for that reason the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.” (Exodus 20:8-11 New American Standard Bible)
That’s it! That’s the sum total of the Sabbath law. If you were an Israelite at the time of Moses, what would you have to do to keep the Sabbath? That’s easy. You’d have to take the last day of a seven-day week and do no work. You’d take a day off work. A day to rest, relax, take it easy. That doesn’t seem too hard, does it? In modern society, many of us take two days off from work… ‘the weekend’ and we love the weekend, don’t we?
Did the commandment on the Sabbath tell the Israelites what to do on the Sabbath? No! It told them what not to do. It told them not to work. There is no instruction to worship on the Sabbath, is there? If Yahweh had told them they had to worship Him on the Sabbath, wouldn’t that imply they didn’t have to worship him the other six days? Their worship of God wasn’t confined to a single day, nor was it based on formalized ceremony in the centuries following the time of Moses. Instead, they had this instruction:
“Hear, Israel: Yahweh is our God. Yahweh is one. You shall love Yahweh your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might. These words, which I command you today, shall be on your heart; and you shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise up.” (Deuteronomy 6:4-7 World English Bible)
Okay, that was Israel. What about us? Do we as Christians have to keep the Sabbath?
Well, the Sabbath is the fourth of the Ten Commandments, and the Ten Commandments are the foundation of the Mosaic Law. They are like its constitution, aren’t they? So if we have to keep the Sabbath, then we have to keep the Mosaic Law. But we know that we don’t have to keep the Mosaic law. How do we know that? Because the whole question was settled 2000 years ago when certain Judaizers were trying to promote the introduction of circumcision among the gentile Christians. You see, they saw circumcision as the thin edge of the wedge which would allow them to slowly introduce the entire Mosaic law among the Gentile Christians so as to make Christianity more acceptable to the Jews. They were motivated by fear of Jewish ostracism. They wanted to belong to the larger Jewish community and not be persecuted for Jesus Christ.
So the whole issue came before the congregation in Jerusalem, and guided by holy spirit, the question was resolved. The ruling that went forth to all the congregations was that Gentile Christians would not be burdened with circumcision nor the rest of the Jewish law code. They were told to avoid only four things:
“It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond these essential requirements: You must abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals, and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things.” (Acts 15:28, 29 Berean Study Bible)
These four things were all common practices in pagan temples, so the only restriction put upon these former pagans now turned Christian was to abstain from things that might lead them back into pagan worship.
If it is still not clear to us that the law was no longer in force for Christians, consider these words of rebuke from Paul to the Galatians who were gentile Christians and who were being seduced to follow the Judizaers (Jewish Christians) who were falling back into relying on works of law for sanctification:
“O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law, or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish? After starting in the Spirit, are you now finishing in the flesh? Have you suffered so much for nothing, if it really was for nothing? Does God lavish His Spirit on you and work miracles among you because you practice the law, or because you hear and believe?” (Galatians 3:1-5 BSB)
“It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not be encumbered once more by a yoke of slavery. Take notice: I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I testify to every man who gets himself circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are trying to be justified by the law have been severed from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.” (Galatians 5:1-4 BSB)
If a Christian was to get himself circumcised, Paul says then they would be obliged to obey the whole law which would include the 10 Commandments with its law on the Sabbath along with all the hundreds of other laws. But that would mean they were trying to be justified or declared righteous by law and so would be “severed from Christ.” If you’re severed from Christ, then you are severed from salvation.
Now, I have heard arguments from Sabbatarians claiming that the 10 Commandments are distinct from the law. But nowhere in Scripture is such a distinction made. Evidence that the 10 commandments were tied to the law and that the entire code had passed away for Christians is found in these words of Paul:
“Therefore let no one judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a feast, a New Moon, or a Sabbath.” (Colossians 2:16 BSB)
The dietary laws covering what an Israelite could eat or drink were part of the extended law code, but the Sabbath law was part of the 10 commandments. Yet here, Paul makes no distinction between the two. So, a Christian could eat pork or not and it was nobody’s business but his own. That same Christian could choose to keep the Sabbath or choose not to keep it and, again, it was not up to anyone to judge whether this was good or bad. It was a matter of personal conscience. From this, we can see that Sabbath keeping for Christians in the first century was not a matter upon which their salvation depended. In other words, if you want to keep the Sabbath, then keep it, but don’t go preaching that your salvation, or the salvation of anyone else, depends on keeping the Sabbath.
This should be enough to dismiss the whole idea that keeping the Sabbath is a salvation issue. So, how does the Seventh Day Adventist Church get around this? How is Mark Martin able to promote his idea that we have to keep the Sabbath to be considered real Christians?
Let’s get into this because it’s a classic example of how eisegesis can be used to pervert the teaching of the Bible. Remember eisegesis is where we impose our own ideas on Scripture, often cherry-picking a verse and ignoring its textual and historical context in order to support the dogma of a religious tradition and its organizational structure.
We saw that the Sabbath as explained in the 10 commandments was simply about taking a day off work. However, the Seventh Day Adventist Church goes way beyond that. Take, for example, this statement from the Adventist.org web site:
“The Sabbath is “a symbol of our redemption in Christ, a sign of our sanctification, a token of our allegiance, and a foretaste of our eternal future in God’s kingdom, and a perpetual sign of God’s eternal covenant between him and his people.” (From Adventist.org/the-sabbath/)
The St. Helena Seventh-day Adventist church claims on their web site:
The Bible teaches that those who receive the gift of Christ's character will observe His Sabbath as a sign or seal of their spiritual experience. Thus the people who receive the last-day seal of God will be Sabbath-keepers.
The last-day seal of God is given to those Christian believers who will not die but will be alive when Jesus comes.
(St. Helena Seventh-Day Adventist web site [https://sthelenaca.adventistchurch.org/about/worship-with-us/bible-studies/dr-erwin-gane/the-sabbath-~-and-salvation])
Actually, this isn’t even a good example of eisegesis because there is no attempt here to prove any of this from Scripture. These are just bald statements passed off as teachings from God. If you are a former Jehovah’s Witness, this must sound very familiar to you. Just as there is nothing in Scripture supporting the idea of an overlapping generation measuring out the length of the last days, there is likewise nothing in Scripture that talks about the Sabbath as a last-day seal of God. There is nothing in Scripture equating a day of rest with being sanctified, justified, or declared righteous in God’s eyes for everlasting life. The Bible does talk about a seal, a token or sign, or a guarantee that results in our salvation but that has nothing to do with taking a day off work. No. Instead, it applies as a mark of our adoption by God as His children. Consider these verses:
“And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.” (Ephesians 1:13,14 BSB)
“Now it is God who establishes both us and you in Christ. He anointed us, placed His seal on us, and put His Spirit in our hearts as a pledge of what is to come.” (2 Corinthians 1:21,22 BSB)
“And God has prepared us for this very purpose and has given us the Spirit as a pledge of what is to come.” (2 Corinthians 5:5 BSB)
Seventh-day Adventists have taken the unique seal or sign of the Holy Spirit and have obscenely desecrated it. They have replaced the true use of the sign or seal of the Holy Spirit meant to identify the reward of everlasting life (the inheritance of the children of God) with an irrelevant work-based activity that doesn’t have any legitimate support in the New Covenant. Why? Because the New Covenant is based on faith working through love. It does not depend on physical compliance with practices and rites regulated in a law code—on works, not faith. Paul explains the difference quite nicely:
“For through the Spirit, by faith, we ourselves eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness. For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.” (Galatians 5:5,6 ESV)
You could substitute circumcision for Sabbath keeping and that scripture would work just as nicely.
The problem Sabbath promotors face is how to apply the Sabbath which is part of the Mosaic Law when that law code has become obsolete under the New Covenant. The writer of Hebrews made that clear:
“By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.” (Hebrews 8:13 BSB)
Still, Sabbatarians eisegetically fashion a work-around to this truth. They do this by claiming that the Sabbath law predates the Mosaic law so it must still be valid today.
For this to even begin to work, Mark and his associates have to make a number of interpretations that have no basis in Scripture. First of all, they teach that the six creative days were literal 24-hour days. So when God rested on the seventh day, he rested for 24 hours. This is just silly. If he only rested for 24 hours, then he was back to work on the eighth day, right? What did he do that second week? Start creating again? There have been over 300,000 weeks since creation. Has Yahweh been working for six days, then taking the seventh day off over 300,000 times since Adam walked the earth? You think?
I’m not even going to get into the scientific proof that negates the absurd belief that the universe is only 7000 years old. Are we really expected to believe that God decided to use the rotation of an insignificant speck of dust that we call planet Earth as a kind of celestial wristwatch to guide him in his timekeeping?
Again, eisegesis requires Sabbatarians to ignore contrary scriptural evidence to promote their idea. Such evidence as this:
“For a thousand years in Your sight
Are like yesterday when it is past,
And like a watch in the night.”
(Psalm 90:4 NKJV)
What is yesterday to you? To me, it’s just a thought, it’s gone. A watch in the night? “You take the 12 to 4 am shift, soldier.” That’s a thousand years to Yahweh. The literalism that causes men to promote a literal six creative days makes a mockery of the Bible, of our Heavenly Father, and of his provision for our salvation.
Sabbath promotors like Mark Martin and the Seventh Day Adventists need us to accept that God rested on a literal 24-hour day so that they can now promote the idea—again completely unsupported by any evidence in Scripture—that humans were keeping a Sabbath day from the time of creation right down to the introduction of the Mosaic Law. Not only is there no support for that in Scripture, but it ignores the context in which we find the 10 Commandments.
Exegetically, we want to consider the context always. When you look at the 10 commandments, you find that there is no explanation about what it means to not murder, not steal, not commit adultery, not lie. However, when it comes to the Sabbath law, God explains what he means and how it is to be applied. If the Jews had been keeping the Sabbath all along, no such explanation would be necessary. Of course, how could they have kept any kind of Sabbath given that they were slaves and had to work when their Egyptian masters told them to work.
But, again, Mark Martin and the Seventh-day Adventists need us to ignore all this evidence because they want us to believe that the Sabbath predates the law so that they can get around the fact that it is clearly explained in the Christian Scriptures to all of us that the Mosaic law is not applicable to Christians anymore.
Why oh why do they go to all this effort? The reason is something close to many of us who have escaped the bondage and ravages of organized religion.
Religion is all about man dominating man to his injury as Ecclesiastes 8:9 says. If you want a bunch of people to follow you, you need to sell them something that no one else has. You also need them to live in fearful expectation that failing to heed your teachings will lead to their eternal damnation.
For Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Governing Body has to convince their followers to believe they have to attend all the meetings and obey everything the publications tell them to do for fear that if they don’t, when the end comes suddenly, they’ll miss out on valuable, life-saving instruction.
Seventh-day Adventists depend on the same fear that Armageddon is going to come at any moment and unless people are faithful to the Seventh-day Adventist movement, they will be swept away. So, they latch onto the Sabbath, which as we’ve seen was merely a day of rest and make it into a day of worship. You have to worship on the Sabbath Day according to the Jewish calendar—which by the way, didn’t exist in the garden of Eden, did it? You can’t go to other churches because they worship on Sunday, and if you worship on Sunday, you’re going to be destroyed by God because he will be angry with you because that’s not the day he wants you to worship him. You see how it works? You see the parallels between the Seventh-day Adventist church and the Organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses? It’s a bit scary, isn’t it? But very clear and perceptible by the children of God who know that worshiping God in Spirit and truth means not following the rules of men but being led by Holy Spirit.
The apostle John made this clear when he wrote:
“I am writing these things to warn you about those who want to lead you astray. But you have received the Holy Spirit…so you don’t need anyone to teach you what is true. For the Spirit teaches you everything you need to know…it is not a lie. So just as [the Holy Spirit] has taught you, remain in fellowship with Christ. (1 John 2:26,27 NLT)
Do you remember the words of the Samaritan woman to Jesus? She was taught that to worship God in a way that he found acceptable, she had to do so on Mount Gerizim where Jacob’s well was. Jesus told her that formalized worship in a particular place such as Mount Gerizim or at the temple in Jerusalem was a thing of the past.
“But the time is coming—indeed it’s here now—when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth. The Father is looking for those who will worship him that way. For God is Spirit, so those who worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.” (John 4:23,24)
True worshipers are being sought by God to worship him in spirit and truth wherever they want to and whenever they want to. But that won’t work if you’re trying to organize a religion and get people to obey you. If you want to set up your own organized religion, you need to brand yourself as distinct from the rest.
Let’s summarize what we learned from the scriptures about the Sabbath so far. We don’t have to worship God between the hours of 6 PM Friday to 6 PM Saturday to be saved. We don’t even have to take a day of rest between those hours, because we are not under the Mosaic law.
If we are still not allowed to take the Lord’s name in vain, worship idols, dishonour our parents, murder, steal, lie, etc., then why is the Sabbath seemingly an exception? Actually, it isn’t. We are to keep the Sabbath, but just not in the way that Mark Martin, or the Seventh-day Adventists would have us do.
According to the letter to the Hebrews, the Mosaic Law was only a shadow of the things to come:
“The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming—not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship.” (Hebrews 10:1)
A shadow has no substance, but it does indicate the presence of something with real substance. The law with its fourth commandment on the Sabbath was an insubstantial shadow when compared with the reality that is the Christ. Still, the shadow represents the reality that casts it, so we have to ask what is the reality that is represented by the law on the sabbath? We’ll explore that in the next video.
Thank you for watching. If you’d like to be notified of future video releases, click the subscribe button and the notification bell.
If you’d like to support our work, there is a donation link in the description of this video.
Thank you so much.
Archived Comments
We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.
Comment by jwc on 2022-12-30 09:05:13
I’m so disappointment!!! Keeping a weekly Sabbath is so appealing.
No email “pinging,” no mobile phone txt
messages, no Utube video’s, no expectations from family & friends for 24 hours.
In fact I think a midweek Sabbath is also a good idea
Comment by jwc on 2022-12-30 09:06:15
Forgive me Eric. What you say is true but …
Comment by Frits van Pelt on 2022-12-30 09:51:56
Read Colossians 2 : 16-17, and take your conclusions.
Reply by jwc on 2022-12-30 10:05:04
I agree, if a Christian wants to take a day to devote to his worship of Jehovah (switching the mobile phone off) that is perfectly acceptable.
There is no law that excludes our devotion.
I share my love of my Beloved Christ with you.
1 John 5:5
Comment by ironsharpensiron on 2022-12-30 11:09:57
You see the people who worship the one true God came together on the Sabbath day. If you worship the one true God this was the day that he picked. It identifies his people and separates them from the rest of the world. And Christians that know this and believe in the Sabbath day, it separates them from much of Christianity.
Separation for the sake of separation. John 7:18
Comment by Condoriano on 2022-12-31 08:15:45
Imagine reading the gospels, specifically the parts with the Pharisees getting mad at Jesus for not keeping the Sabbath, and you say to yourself, "I really want to be more like them!"
Colossians 2:16 alone should make this an open-and-shut case.
Mark 2:27 should also be considered. The Sabbath is not inherently a sacred day. It was ultimately a provision for the Israelites (free and slave) to rest. It really was in the spirit of mercy, especially considering the Sabbath year.
The more I think about this claim, the more crazy it is. Saying you have to keep the Sabbath to be a true Christian is really no different from the average JW saying you need to attend meetings to be a true/spiritually strong Christian. Ever heard of the "3 F's"? "The only reasons you shouldn't be at a meeting is if you have a fever, fracture, or if it's your funeral (your dead)." Is it because they really think they receive essential spiritual food at every meeting? I doubt it. They actually recognize the inconvenience of attending meetings and see it as them offering a sacrifice for their worship... thus earning spiritual brownie points, in their minds. Insisting on keeping the Sabbath as a Christian is really no different.
Comment by James Mansoor on 2022-12-31 20:15:47
Good morning everyone,
Romans 14:4 Who are you to judge the servant of another? To his own master he stands or falls. Indeed, he will be made to stand, for Jehovah can make him stand. 5 One man judges one day as above another; another judges one day the same as all others; let each one be fully convinced in his own mind. 6 The one who observes the day observes it to Jehovah. Also, the one who eats, eats to Jehovah, for he gives thanks to God; and the one who does not eat does not eat to Jehovah, and yet gives thanks to God.
It’s a matter of conscience.
Paul is making it clear that Christians are not to judge one another in matters of conscience.
The scripture is very clear that Jehovah is the one who is going to do the judging.
No Christian has the right to judge his brother because that brother belongs exclusively to Jehovah God and his son Jesus Christ and no one else.
Comment by Ad_Lang on 2023-01-01 10:26:06
"Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." (Mat 7:13 KJV)
This is one of the expressions that came to my mind. I am only starting to realise, I think, what this actually means. The amount of people worldwide calling themselves Christian number beyond a billion, if I'm not mistaken, and yet how many really do have the faith to let themselves be guided by holy spirit, which we cannot see, hear or even feel, oftentimes.
The Jews were living according to the Law code, written rules to live by. Jesus set us free from those written rules. Paul explained: "For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh; but he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit not in the letter; whose praise is not from men, but from God." (Romans 2:28-29 WEB) In other words, we have died toward that which restrained us, the Law with it's restrictive rules (Romans 7:6). As a result, the prophecy through Jeremiah is being fulfilled in this manner, where Jehovah promised: "For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel, after those days, saith Jehovah: I will put my law in their inward parts, and will write it in their heart; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people." (Jer 31:33 DARBY). This is the law of love, which is an extremely powerful motivating force.
Is love a suitable equivalent to the Law, that it might replace the Law without falling short of the principles of the Law? Paul put it down in simple terms: "Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law" (Romans 13:10). If we take the two greatest commandments, to love God above anything else and our neighbour as ourselves, it is not too difficult for most of us to know or learn right from wrong in most situations. We have holy spirit to guide us, and our brothers in the faith for support if we cannot discern what the spirit is saying. This being the case, mankind is already being brought back to how it used to be: a life without rules, where love was the motivating force to set the boundaries.
Thus I learned what sin actually is: the opposite of love. When Adam sinned, he did harm to his relationship with God, but also to God himself, because Adam rejected his position in relation to God and his Father's ultimate authority. It is ironic that the things Satan promised Adam were things he already had: he could decide for himself what was right and wrong, and had complete freedom of choice given by his heavenly Father. Any boundaries he would have had, would have been a result of love for his Father. In such case, are boundaries still boundaries? Consider the individual you love most of all: would you intentionally hurt and harm them? Of course not, the thought wouldn't even enter your mind, would it?!
As Paul explained elsewhere, the Law was a guardian to teach us right from wrong, like children. But when children have learned to make good decisions, they will be released from the law of their guardians as they grow up, once they are ready to make their own choices and be accountable for them. It is sad to see that so many Christians are actually rejecting their freedom by attaching themselves to yet another set of rules, and therefore stop progressing toward maturity at some point.
I think this is the very issue Paul had in mind when he complained: "We have a great deal to say about this, and it’s difficult to explain, since you have become too lazy to understand. Although by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the basic principles of God’s revelation again. You need milk, not solid food. Now everyone who lives on milk is inexperienced with the message about righteousness, because he is an infant. But solid food is for the mature—for those whose senses have been trained to distinguish between good and evil." (Hebrews 5:11-14 HCSB)
Comment by thegabry on 2023-01-04 08:21:34
salve volevo creare un nuovo post ma non sono riuscito a farlo.
Sono testimone da 43 anni e solo negli ultimi mesi mi sto rendendo conto di essere fra i
" Molti" di cui parla Daniele 12:4.
vorrei condividere le riflessioni inerenti alla VERA conoscenza.
Inanzi tengo a precisare che dopo aver spazzato via il fondamento della WTS, sia opportuno concentrarsi sulla VERA CONOSCENZA.
Il fondamento della WTS si basa esclusivamente sulla Data del 1914 , come anche da recenti articoli apparsi sulla TdG.
Basta comunque mettere insieme poche , ma chiare, scritture per demolire alla base questo Falso/grossolano.
Gesù, Interrogato dai discepoli in Matteo 24:3 circa la i segni della Sua PRESENZA,
ai versetti 4 e 5 risponde " State attenti che nessuno vi inganni,perchè MOLTI verranno nel MIO NOME, dicendo Sono io il Cristo (L'UNTO), e inganneranno molti, questo precede i SEGNI delle guerre e notizie di guerre...in altre parole i MOLTI sarebbero VENUTI prima dell'Inizio del "SEGNO"
confrontando le scritture di Matteo 24:4,5 con luca 21:8 " Lui rispose : state attenti a non farvi ingannare, perchè molti verranno nel mio nome, dicendo " sono io ( il Cristo o L'unto),
e , " Il TEMPO STABILITO É VICINO".
in Altre parole prima che cominciassero i segni del tempo della fine .Molti Sarebbero venuti nel nome di Cristo ( Cristiani) affermando di essere UNTI (Cristi), e Avrebbero affermato che il Tempo stabilito, Ovviamente "DELLA PRESENZA" (Soggetto del discorso).
Ora è molto semplice Identificare Chi è uno di questi "MOLTI".
Carles Taze Russel, " VENNE" Definendosi "UNTO" (SONO IO)e Affermando che Lui sapeva che il "TEMPO STABILITO DELLA PRESENZA DI CRISTO" era vicino.
Infatti il Secondo Libro " studi sulle scritture" "THE TIME IS AT HAND" " IL TEMPO É VICINO" 1889 ,Adempie perfettamente le Parole di Gesù con Le Quali avvertiva i suoi discepoli.
Ricordiamo che Gesù per rispondere alla domanda su quanto sarebbe "venuto" nella Sua presenza/Regno , non rispose che sarebbe Bastato Leggere il Capitolo 4 Del Libro di Daniele, Disse che Lui non lo sapeva " ma solo il Padre", inoltre dopo la sua resurrezione ATTI 1:3 dice che rimase con i discepoli per 40 giorni e PARLÒ DEL REGNO, dopodiche gli chiesero al versetto 6 " è questo il tempo in cui ristabilirai il regno di Israele?"
Ma come? Non gli aveva detto che in Daniele al cap 4 era contenuta la DATA precisa in cui il Regno sarebbe VENUTO?Evidentemente perchè non era così.
Inoltre in 2 Tessalonicesi 2 :1-3 ( 51 E.V.) l'Apostolo Paolo non dice che il "giorno del Signore" ( NON di Geova)Sarebbe Venuto dopo 1863 anni ( 1863+51=1914).
Anzi L'Apostolo Paolo avverte riguardo alla "Presenza" di non dare retta a "espressioni Ispirate", "discorsi" o "false Lettere" secondo cui il Giorno del Signore sia venuto.
Qui La WTS sostituisce al "Giorno del Signore" il "Giorno di GEOVA", ma il Soggetto del discorso era " la PRESENZA e il NOSTRO RADUNAMENTO", quindi cosa c'entra il Giorno di Geova nel Discorso?
continuando in 2 Tessalonicesi 2 1-12, viene descritta esattamente la WTS , e identificata come L'uomo dell'illegalità Il figlio della Distruzione , ma di questo semmai ne parleremo.