James Penton speaks about the origins of the teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses

– posted by J_Penton
Witnesses are taught that Charles Taze Russell originated all the teachings that make Jehovah's Witnesses stand out from the other religions in Christendom. This turns out to be untrue. In fact, it will surprise most Witnesses to learn that their millenarian teachings come from a Catholic priest, a Jesuit no less. James Penton, a Canadian history professor and author of several scholarly books on Jehovah's Witnesses takes us back three centuries to the origin of many of the doctrines Witnesses mistakenly believe are theirs alone.

[embed]https://youtu.be/cuZMD4Uzn7M[/embed]

Archived Comments

We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.

  • Comment by Leonardo Josephus on 2019-12-28 12:09:46

    Hi Eric. Thanks so much for arranging this. All the background stuff is so helpful. Interesting to note the connection to the Plymouth Brethren, which I was totally unaware of.
    Thanks for the Aldbury Park link too.
    A lot about Russell was what I had concluded, namely that he hi-jacked ideas from others.
    Am I right that much of this information is in James Penton's book ?

    • Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2020-01-09 13:34:46

      That's correct. It's in Apocalypse Delayed

  • Comment by Chet on 2019-12-30 11:51:09

    Great information. What I find most interesting is that many religions are now finding their teachings scrutinized as the Internet makes information more readily available.

    It’s obvious that the Witnesses are not what they would claim to be. Their origins are not nearly so concise as they would have us believe. There’s nothing surprising about this. The 18th and 19th centuries were a time when many religious speculations were born and all sorts of new ideas came to light. I don’t think of this as bad, in and of itself, because people were resisting the hegemony of the religious establishment and paving the way for reform.

    The bad part is when people decide that these new movements should be followed without question. I can see no evidence that God is behind any of these movements. What is good, is that people are questioning and striving to see beyond the traditions of men.

Recent content

This was just released in English on JW.org. (I’ll put all the links in the description field of this video.)So it appears that everything is a matter of conscience except for taking a full-on blood transfusion.How this…

Today I want to tackle a question that comes up regularly in theological discussions, and it's one that has particular relevance for those of us who've spent time in the world of Jehovah's Witnesses — though it goes well…

Today we're going to delve into the nature of God. Just saying that sounds presumptuous—as if we, mere humans, can understand the nature of God. The fact is, we can't. All we can understand is what he reveals to us.We…

In the previous videos, we've examined the passages Trinitarians use to establish that Jesus is God. What did we find? Not one of them proved categorically and unambiguously that there is such a thing as a trinity…

Does Being "The First and the Last" Prove That Yeshua Is Almighty God?Among the many passages cited in support of the Trinity, few are considered more compelling than Revelation 1:17–18 and Revelation 22:12–13. The…

Making God's Name Known Doesn't Mean What You Think It Does.Would you name your child Jesus? It's not a very common name in English-speaking countries, but in Latin America there are many men who are called Jesus, though…