James Penton speaks about the origins of the teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses

– posted by J_Penton
Witnesses are taught that Charles Taze Russell originated all the teachings that make Jehovah's Witnesses stand out from the other religions in Christendom. This turns out to be untrue. In fact, it will surprise most Witnesses to learn that their millenarian teachings come from a Catholic priest, a Jesuit no less. James Penton, a Canadian history professor and author of several scholarly books on Jehovah's Witnesses takes us back three centuries to the origin of many of the doctrines Witnesses mistakenly believe are theirs alone.

[embed]https://youtu.be/cuZMD4Uzn7M[/embed]

Archived Comments

We have moved to the Disqus commenting system. To post a new comment, go to the bottom of this page.

  • Comment by Leonardo Josephus on 2019-12-28 12:09:46

    Hi Eric. Thanks so much for arranging this. All the background stuff is so helpful. Interesting to note the connection to the Plymouth Brethren, which I was totally unaware of.
    Thanks for the Aldbury Park link too.
    A lot about Russell was what I had concluded, namely that he hi-jacked ideas from others.
    Am I right that much of this information is in James Penton's book ?

    • Reply by Meleti Vivlon on 2020-01-09 13:34:46

      That's correct. It's in Apocalypse Delayed

  • Comment by Chet on 2019-12-30 11:51:09

    Great information. What I find most interesting is that many religions are now finding their teachings scrutinized as the Internet makes information more readily available.

    It’s obvious that the Witnesses are not what they would claim to be. Their origins are not nearly so concise as they would have us believe. There’s nothing surprising about this. The 18th and 19th centuries were a time when many religious speculations were born and all sorts of new ideas came to light. I don’t think of this as bad, in and of itself, because people were resisting the hegemony of the religious establishment and paving the way for reform.

    The bad part is when people decide that these new movements should be followed without question. I can see no evidence that God is behind any of these movements. What is good, is that people are questioning and striving to see beyond the traditions of men.

Recent content

The Case for Daniel:Why the Maccabean Date Does Not Settle the QuestionBy Eric WilsonThere is a standard move in critical biblical scholarship: when someone points to the Book of Daniel as evidence of genuine prophecy, the response is swift and…

The 2026 Annual Meeting of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society took place on Saturday, October 3rd, just two weeks after the Governing Body reversed its long-standing prohibition on blood transfusions.If I had to sum…

Hello, everyone, and welcome back. Today I want to look at a single verse—just one verse—that creates an enormous problem for Trinitarian teaching. And it's not a problem that can be evaded by appealing to mysterious…

Have you ever noticed how much theology can hide inside a single verse? Not in some contested passage with disputed grammar or debated punctuation, but in a simple sentence of greeting that most readers pass right over.…

 A word of warning: I don’t want to offend anyone, but I’m not going to mince words in this video. Forgive me if I sound harsh, but Jehovah’s Witnesses in particular are facing a crossroads, a do-or-die moment.…

The nation of Israel had a religious governing body just as Jehovah’s Witnesses do. But Jesus did not praise them for caring for the spiritual needs of the people. Instead, he condemned them publicly, calling them the…